Menu

InstagramTwitterYouTubeFacebookSnapchat
Globe Icon

Join

and support
LGBT+ journalism

Trans

Biologist Richard Dawkins condemned for ‘bad faith’ take on trans lives

Josh Milton April 12, 2021
Richard Dawkins gestures while wearing a grey suit and green tie

Richard Dawkins. (Getty/ Don Arnold)

Richard Dawkins drew criticism Saturday (10 April) for a provocative tweet that compared trans people to Rachel Dolezal.

On Saturday morning, an entire minute after tweeting about the late Prince Phillip’s top hat, the evolutionary biologist and outspoken atheist abruptly gave his take on trans lives that absolutely nobody asked for.

Dawkins compared trans folk to Rachel Dolezal, the white woman who appropriated a Black identity while pursuing Black activism and academia.

“In 2015, Rachel Dolezal, a white chapter president of NAACP, was vilified for identifying as Black,” Dawkins wrote.

“Some men choose to identify as women, and some women choose to identify as men.

“You will be vilified if you deny that they literally are what they identify as,” he said, before asking his nearly three million followers to “discuss” his thoughts.

Dolezal once likened herself to trans people. At the time, her words were rebutted by the psychologist and author Guilaine Kinouani, who told BBC Newsnight: “Comparing [being trans] with trans-racialism is a fallacy. It’s a false equivalency, which in my mind doesn’t advance our understanding of race, of transgender issues, neither of Black womanhood. [She’s a] white woman who’s quite oblivious to the fact that Black women’s experiences and bodies have been appropriated.”

Similarly, Dawkins’ comment quickly became a lightning rod for criticism, with trans folk and allies responding with frustration and exhaustion.

In 2015, Richard Dawkins defended Germaine Greer – an author who has referred to trans people as “delusional” over her anti-trans views – amid protest against her speaking at a university.

The 80-year-old has also questioned whether a “trans woman is a woman” previously, before calling it all “semantics”.

“If you define by chromosomes, no,” he wrote. “If by self-identification, yes. I call her ‘she’ out of courtesy.”

His post was met with a backlash among both LGBT+ rights advocates and scientists alike, criticising Dawkins for compressing people to just chromosomes.

His argument has long been debunked by, you know, science and the very advocacy group for “reason and science” Dawkins founded.

Richard Dawkins has been contacted for comment.

More: Richard Dawkins, Trans

Comments
0
MyPinkNews members are invited to comment on articles to discuss the content we publish, or debate issues more generally. Please familiarise yourself with our community guidelines to ensure that our community remains a safe and inclusive space for all.
Loading Comments loading

View more & comment

Swipe sideways to view more posts!

Dismiss

Loading ...

Close icon