<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#039;Gay wedding&#039; vicar in line for Stonewall award</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-9394.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-9394.html/</link>
	<description>PinkNews.co.uk Gay News (UK and world) from Pink News - all the gay news for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community in the UK and beyond- thegaynews from Pink News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:29:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pink_news_watch</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-9394.html/comment-page-1/#comment-37028</link>
		<dc:creator>pink_news_watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/?p=9394#comment-37028</guid>
		<description>So Pink News is proud to be &quot;Stonewall Publication of the Year&quot; along with no less than 3 adverts for Stonewall themselves but no mention of any of this?

http://www.rainbownetwork.com/UserPortal/Article/Detail.aspx?ID=22723&amp;sid=5
http://www.penwing.me.uk/taxonomy/term/219
http://boards.gingerbeer.co.uk/index.php?topic=84503.0
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=7522
http://difficulty.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/stonewall-transphobic-awards/

Yet more New-Labour spun pro-Stonewall propaganda designed to cover up the current controversies surrounding these dubious awards and the fact that there is obviously a very close relationship influencing the impartiality of &quot;Pink News&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Pink News is proud to be "Stonewall Publication of the Year" along with no less than 3 adverts for Stonewall themselves but no mention of any of this?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rainbownetwork.com/UserPortal/Article/Detail.aspx?ID=22723&amp;sid=5" rel="nofollow">http://www.rainbownetwork.com/UserPortal/Article/Detail.aspx?ID=22723&amp;sid=5</a><br />
<a href="http://www.penwing.me.uk/taxonomy/term/219" rel="nofollow">http://www.penwing.me.uk/taxonomy/term/219</a><br />
<a href="http://boards.gingerbeer.co.uk/index.php?topic=84503.0" rel="nofollow">http://boards.gingerbeer.co.uk/index.php?topic=84503.0</a><br />
<a href="http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=7522" rel="nofollow">http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=7522</a><br />
<a href="http://difficulty.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/stonewall-transphobic-awards/" rel="nofollow">http://difficulty.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/stonewall-transphobic-awards/</a></p>
<p>Yet more New-Labour spun pro-Stonewall propaganda designed to cover up the current controversies surrounding these dubious awards and the fact that there is obviously a very close relationship influencing the impartiality of "Pink News".
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=37028 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=37028', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
