Comments on: Gay marriage supporters attack Proposition 102 campaign

By: Mark Forister

Mark Forister — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:19:00 +0000

Traditional marriages in the USA as depicted by Prop 102 end in divorce at the rate of 50% of 1st , 67% of 2nd, and 74% of 3rd marriages as sourced from the Forest Institute of Professional Psychology. Answer this, how can Prop 102 preserve traditional marriages by writing blatant discrimination into out state constitution, it can’t.

(Report comment to the moderator)

By: David

David — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:53:52 +0000

The haters have greater resources to spread their bile. They use messages to reduce our sexuality to sodomy away from relationships and love and sexual expression and pleasure and the families that we form. They dehumanise us. It is not the removal of our fundamental rights but the removal of their right to deny us them. Anything that points out that this all stems from hate sounds like a good idea in my book. More power to our spray cans.

(Report comment to the moderator)

By: Del

Del — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:21:13 +0000

Although I agree this is not the way to go, it is less violent than what Prop 102 is trying to do. Attacking the civil rights of citizens is blatantly anti-American and as US Patriots we need to do everything in our power to protect the country from such harm!

(Report comment to the moderator)

By: Gino Meriano

Gino Meriano — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:29:05 +0000

As a gay rights campaigner for same sex couples and legal rights, this is not the way forward for change. We shoudl work together to repair this damage it will only encourage voters away from say NO to proposition 102

(Report comment to the moderator)