Why the hell are so many of you politically 'liberal' just because we were born gay? I had no choice in my genes, I do have a choice in my 'beliefs'.

If they're softening their stance on my lifestyle and sexual make up that's all well and good but, in the main, I want low taxes and harsh sentances for violent criminals so I'll vote Tory thanks.

I don't feel at all embarassed by that.

(Report comment to the moderator)

(Report comment to the moderator)

(Report comment to the moderator)

(Report comment to the moderator)

I’m a bit unusual,’ she said. ‘I truly don’t see myself as a gay this or lesbian that; I think it’s all very limiting. But that’s not to say that I don’t respect people whose instincts and being and choice are very strictly for one gender or the other. I just hate the sort of feeling that if you’re not in the straight, accepted-norm box, then you must be gay. I don’t think that’s true and it leads to a sense of pressure that a lot of people, who other people think are gay, don’t necessarily feel comfortable with.’

Internalised homophobia? Bisexual? You decide.

(Report comment to the moderator)

Having received a £373 000 loan from Geoffrey Robinson, then Paymaster General, to buy his swanky Notting Hill home, which he forgot to mention to all and sundry, not least the Britannia Building Society (as yet to go bust), his department was then asked to scrutinise the business activities of Mr Robinson.

Whilst most normal folk would consider it prudent to mention in passing that perhaps there may be a slight conflict of interest, Mandy was clearly away with the fairies, so to speak. Not withstanding Tony Blair’s assurances that Labour would be “whiter than white” in contrast to the Conservative government that preceded theirs, Mandy’s lips stayed tighter than a duck’s arse.

Despite the many requests that he should fall on his sword, disappointingly we had to settle for his resignation.

In the face of all logic, he was then hauled back to government only a short time later. No sooner was he back than he was off again. After being caught read-handed – apologies his ‘private secretary’ (that’s a man that does everything for him – including wiping his arse) got caught red-handed flogging a passport to an Indian billionaire for a million pound donation to the millennium dome.

Possibly in hindsight we could get said Indian businessman to bail out the sinking Olympic albatross hanging around all our necks. I’m on the edge of my seat waiting to see his next dishonest dealing.

(Report comment to the moderator)

As it is – this is too little too late. They'll NEVER get my vote.
And their appalling record on gay issues is just one reason out of many. They are and always will be the nasty party.

(Report comment to the moderator)

Initially Harriet, who has an honest face if nothing else, issued a statement through her office that, “We have never known of any involvement by David Abrahams. Neither Chris Leslie nor Janet Kidd mentioned him." When laying herself open to the mercy of the House she stated she acted "within both the letter and spirit of the law".

Some time later after having had her collar felt by Scotland Yard, Harman revealed it had been Brown's campaign coordinator who had recommended she seek a donation from the proxy of David Abrahams, the controversial businessman who has secretly bankrolled the party with £600,000. She disclosed that former minister Chris Leslie, who was running Brown's leadership campaign, had suggested she seek a donation from Janet Kidd, Abrahams' secretary – despite having himself rejected her money for the Brown campaign.

In view of her complete inability to stick to the plan when put under a bit of pressure by the boys in blue, she’s the last person you’d want to be out in the West End with on a Saturday night with 3 ecstasy stuffed down your pants, let alone fundraising for the British Olympics by lying in the witness box at Bernasconi’s in Italy. Far better surely that she sticks to what she knows best – running this country into the ground.

Rest assured though die hard Labour dinosaurs, she might have lied about EVERYTHING else, but she’s not lying about her commitment to equality (honest).

(Report comment to the moderator)

Like Tessa, Alistair isn’t that sharp with figures because though the first tranche of the Bank's emergency lending to Northern Rock in September has been secured against specific assets, the second tranche is secured only by a more general floating charge, which would mean the Bank would be vying with other creditors for repayment if Northern Rock failed. It is not clear how much money was loaned in each tranche, but the emergency loans are thought to have been for about £11bn each.

An analysis by the Guardian newspaper has also discovered that Northern Rock has admitted being in breach of the conditions of the securities it has sold through its Jersey-based Granite Master Issuer, the company which packages and sells mortgage backed securities, but it has decided to ignore the breach.

A examination of Northern Rock's books has found over 70% of its mortgage portfolio (£53bn) – is not owned by the bank, but by an offshore company, Granite. This should be a concern for the Bank and the Treasury (but apparently seems not to be) particularly if the emergency loans have in effect been used to shore up Granite rather than Northern Rock. The government will received no preferential treatment over anyone else owed money if everything goes tits up (again).

Incidentally, the government has announced its new £200m package of measures designed to prevent some of the most vulnerable families losing their homes and experiencing the trauma of repossession, whilst on the other hand the number of homes repossessed by Northern Rock soared by more than 70% to 3710 in the past six months as the bank came under state ownership. So it would appear a clear case of failing to practice what you’re preaching to the wider mortgage sector to help people stay in their homes.

Lets just hope none of you die hard Labour dinosaurs are mortgaged with Northern Rock.

(Report comment to the moderator)

Although she confirmed that she had signed the mortgage forms in 2000, she denied "categorically" that the money had been paid to her husband by Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister and media magnate, in return for Mr Mills's support in two corruption cases. Although Mr Mills had written a letter apparently spelling out to his accountant how the money was given by the Berlusconi organisation in recognition for his services in the witness box, he subsequently retracted the account.

"My husband pays the mortgage, so I was perfectly happy in the division of our finances to sign the charge," she said. "It simply wasn't a problem. It wasn't unusual, it wasn't improper and it certainly wasn't illegal."

There’s a better idea. Die hard Labour dinosaurs keep your cash, we could send a government minister or two over to Italy to give false evidence in exchange for a car boot full of Lira – we could send Mandy, no wait … Harriet Harman has got an honest face – a former Solicitor General must be beyond reproach.

(Report comment to the moderator)

Some, particularly those in London may have been unconvinced of their financial abilities after the announcement that the Olympic bill is running at £9.3bn (source bbc.co.uk), which is 4 time higher than the original cost used in the Olympic bid (a figure which the government referred to at the time as ‘robust’).

Perhaps the diehard Labour dinosaurs would like to have a bit of a whip round to make up the shortfall, or maybe we could tap Northern Rock for a few quid – God knows they have had enough of our money.

(Report comment to the moderator)

(Report comment to the moderator)

From decriminalisation to legalisation, equality and finally recognition it's only Labour Governments that have ever delivered for us, historically and consistently fighting prejudice. Isn't David Cameron still making sneering jokes about Labour looking after one armed lesbians?

If you were in Scotland in 2000/ 1 and saw the Brian Souter/ SNP/ Tory opposition to the repeal of Section 28 up there, it was worse than when we were media- invisible, the amount of homophobia being spewed out everywhere.

We'd still be "criminal filth" if it wasn't for brave people in the Labour Party and I shall never forget my debt to them.

(Report comment to the moderator)

Why on earth vote for them when the Liberal Democrats believe in their core in equality – full equality – for us, and are not afraid to say so, even if it means losing bigot votes. I'm voting for them myself, they actually belief in what they say, not pretend to.

(Report comment to the moderator)

(Report comment to the moderator)

Also. how so very Tory to appeal to people's lower individualistic instincts! (ie our policies are good for you, not for the wider society). How divisive!

(Report comment to the moderator)

They pander to christer bigots and then smirk as they ask for LGBT votes. It’s self destructive to vote for them.

(Report comment to the moderator)

The Conservative vote on the Equality Act (2007) was 29 in favour and 83 against. So that's 26% to 74% respectively, which I'd consider a pretty large majority. So I was actually wrong before it's not two-thirds of Tory MPs who think it's OK to discriminate against gay people, it's nearly three-quarters of them.

(Report comment to the moderator)

http://www.christian.org.uk/mpvotes.php?selection=&value1=627&submit1=SHOW&value2=1

Those who say the labour party took ages to repeal Section 28 should be reminded that the bill kept being scuppered in the house of Lords, mostly by hereditary peers, clerics and other hangers on, many of whom were thankfully swept away in the reforms some years ago.

Section 28 may well be in the past. But I'm most concerned that the Tories show too much respect for faith groups – the main source of bigotry – and religious rights are likely to trump everyone else's.

They made some robust statements on 'Sharia law' yesterday, which is good. But only earlier this year the tories were the ones campaigning for the 'need for the father' in the embryo bill, and ignoring scientific evidence, and listening too much to christian fanatics.

(Report comment to the moderator)

(Report comment to the moderator)