<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uruguayan parliament passes civil unions law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-6228.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-6228.html/</link>
	<description>PinkNews.co.uk Gay News (UK and world) from Pink News - all the gay news for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community in the UK and beyond- thegaynews from Pink News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:26:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert, ex-pat Brit</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-6228.html/comment-page-1/#comment-24160</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert, ex-pat Brit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-6228.html#comment-24160</guid>
		<description>	Omar, I agree with you.  Imagine, Uruguay allowing all its citizens the option not to marry.  We should have done it from day one and provided even more equality for everyone.  They wouldn&#039;t do it because it wouldn&#039;t have been politically correct and then there&#039;s the wrath of the Church of England and others who would have ranted on about how the insitution of marriage was being watered down.  As it is, they think civil partnerships are bad and send the wrong message.  No government should be in the business of saying who can and who can&#039;t marry.  Its a civil issue not a religious one, but bother major parties are scared to confront them.  As taxpayers, they should be told to shut the f--k up or else there will be no more state religion interfering in the political system. Its done enough damage as it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omar, I agree with you.  Imagine, Uruguay allowing all its citizens the option not to marry.  We should have done it from day one and provided even more equality for everyone.  They wouldn't do it because it wouldn't have been politically correct and then there's the wrath of the Church of England and others who would have ranted on about how the insitution of marriage was being watered down.  As it is, they think civil partnerships are bad and send the wrong message.  No government should be in the business of saying who can and who can't marry.  Its a civil issue not a religious one, but bother major parties are scared to confront them.  As taxpayers, they should be told to shut the f&#8211;k up or else there will be no more state religion interfering in the political system. Its done enough damage as it is.
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=24160 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=24160', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMAR kUDDUS</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-6228.html/comment-page-1/#comment-24161</link>
		<dc:creator>OMAR kUDDUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-6228.html#comment-24161</guid>
		<description>	Mr (Gordon) Brown, Uruguay’s even letting ALL its citizens’ form cavil partnerships. So why cant you?Its bad enough that we cant get married but have to settle for civil partnerships instead, but you still deny this to all British citizens, despite your government being beaten in the Court of Appeals in May this year, this basic human right (article 12 EUHR); THE RIGHT TO MARRY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr (Gordon) Brown, Uruguay’s even letting ALL its citizens’ form cavil partnerships. So why cant you?Its bad enough that we cant get married but have to settle for civil partnerships instead, but you still deny this to all British citizens, despite your government being beaten in the Court of Appeals in May this year, this basic human right (article 12 EUHR); THE RIGHT TO MARRY.
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=24161 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=24161', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
