<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton criticised over gay marriage stance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-560.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-560.html/</link>
	<description>PinkNews.co.uk Gay News (UK and world) from Pink News - all the gay news for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community in the UK and beyond- thegaynews from Pink News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:56:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-560.html/comment-page-1/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-560.html#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>	Are you sure Ms. Clinton supports a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage?  This assertion is inconsistent with the New York Observer article you cite (see ), which states Van Capelle&#039;s objection to Clinton&#039;s &quot;support for DOMA.&quot;  As I&#039;m sure you know, DOMA and the FMA are not the same creatures.  One is an enacted statute; the other is a proposal to amend the US constitution. If you claim Clinton supports the more draconican FMA, I should like to see some evidence for it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure Ms. Clinton supports a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage?  This assertion is inconsistent with the New York Observer article you cite (see ), which states Van Capelle's objection to Clinton's "support for DOMA."  As I'm sure you know, DOMA and the FMA are not the same creatures.  One is an enacted statute; the other is a proposal to amend the US constitution. If you claim Clinton supports the more draconican FMA, I should like to see some evidence for it!
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1735 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=1735', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
