Ohio's landmark ruling on same-sex domestic abuse
Domestic violence laws in the US state of Ohio do not conflict with its same-sex marriage ban, the state Supreme Court ruled yesterday.
The judges rejected the argument that domestic violence law was unenforceable in cases not involving married couples, because the law refers to 'spouses.'
Chief Justice Thomas Moyer said that lawmakers included several groups under the domestic violence law, and that defining living arrangements was not the same as creating a law defining marriage.
"The state does not create cohabitation; rather it is a person's determination to share some of life's responsibilities with another that creates cohabitation," Moyer wrote, according to AP.
"The state does not have a role in creating cohabitation, but it does have a role in creating a marriage."
The decision was sparked after a man was charged with assaulting his girlfriend, who he lived with, under the domestic violence law.
Lawyers argued that the man could not be charged because under the ban on same-sex marriage, the state can not assign legal status to unmarried couples.
Twenty-seven US states currently define marriage as between a man and a woman only.
Ohio's definition is particularly broad as it denies same-sex and unmarried couples any legal status.
Related Articles:








Save to Browser Favorites
Ask
backflip
blinklist
BlogBookmark
Bloglines
BlogMarks
Blogsvine
BUMPzee!
CiteULike
co.mments
Connotea
del.icio.us
DotNetKicks
Digg
diigo
dropjack.com
dzone
Facebook
Fark
Faves
Feed Me Links
Friendsite
folkd.com
Furl
Google
Hugg
Jeqq
Kaboodle
kirtsy
linkaGoGo
LinksMarker
Ma.gnolia
Mister Wong
Mixx
MySpace
MyWeb
Netvouz
Newsvine
PlugIM
popcurrent
Propeller
Reddit
Rojo
Segnalo
Shoutwire
Simpy
Slashdot
Sphere
Sphinn
Spurl.net
Squidoo
StumbleUpon
Technorati
ThisNext
Webride
Windows Live
Yahoo!
Email This to a Friend
If you like this then please subscribe to the 














No Comments Yet on Ohio's landmark ruling on same-sex domestic abuse