Comment: Is it right to call Lord Browne gay?
Save to Browser Favorites
Ask
backflip
blinklist
BlogBookmark
Bloglines
BlogMarks
Blogsvine
BUMPzee!
CiteULike
co.mments
Connotea
del.icio.us
DotNetKicks
Digg
diigo
dropjack.com
dzone
Facebook
Fark
Faves
Feed Me Links
Friendsite
folkd.com
Furl
Google
Hugg
Jeqq
Kaboodle
kirtsy
linkaGoGo
LinksMarker
Ma.gnolia
Mister Wong
Mixx
MySpace
MyWeb
Netvouz
Newsvine
PlugIM
popcurrent
Propeller
Reddit
Rojo
Segnalo
Shoutwire
Simpy
Slashdot
Sphere
Sphinn
Spurl.net
Squidoo
StumbleUpon
Technorati
ThisNext
Webride
Windows Live
Yahoo!
Email This to a Friend
If you like this then please subscribe to the Ben Cohen
Most of the time, I feel perfectly comfortable with my sexuality at Channel 4 News. The Channel has a remit to promote diversity and it's hardly a macho environment.
But I did feel a little unsure about our coverage of Lord Browne last night.
To me the most interesting thing to emerge from the whole sorry saga is why the Mail on Sunday were that interested in Lord Browne's sexuality.
The other problem is labels, a number of friends of mine phoned up to criticise Jon Snow's use of "homosexual."
"It sounds like he's saying it with disgust," one said.
I explained that Jon is no closet homophobe. But he does come from a considerably earlier generation- he grew up when gay meant only happy.
I then debated whether Lord Browne should have been referred to on air as gay, but I'm rather unsure.
To me, being gay means "good as you", in many ways it's a political statement.
I don't think I was gay until I came out, to myself, my friends and family. And I guess to the wider world.
Lord Browne hasn't done this, so is he gay? Or has he just had a "gay relationship"?
Should we care how he met his partner? Or is it just because he's another man?
Ben Cohen is founding publisher of PinkNews.co.uk and technology correspondent for Channel 4 News.
Related Articles:
15 Comments on Comment: Is it right to call Lord Browne gay?