<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: COMMENT: Gay adults must challenge homophobic teachers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html/</link>
	<description>PinkNews.co.uk Gay News (UK and world) from Pink News - all the gay news for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community in the UK and beyond- thegaynews from Pink News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:53:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html/comment-page-1/#comment-40757</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html#comment-40757</guid>
		<description>I believe that we as gay people should not take leads from the heterosexuals. Gay people have separate identities and should develop in their own way. This would avoid many problems, such as marriage, which is further complicated by being embedded in a religious ceremony. Gay philosophy must move away from reliance on institutions. Also, being gay uses heterosexuality as a framework and using this as a context only causes reactive problems. 
Thankyou for your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that we as gay people should not take leads from the heterosexuals. Gay people have separate identities and should develop in their own way. This would avoid many problems, such as marriage, which is further complicated by being embedded in a religious ceremony. Gay philosophy must move away from reliance on institutions. Also, being gay uses heterosexuality as a framework and using this as a context only causes reactive problems.<br />
Thankyou for your time.
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=40757 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=40757', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html/comment-page-1/#comment-6794</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html#comment-6794</guid>
		<description>	True civil partnerships are not marriage - it is still discrimination.But I don&#039;t think we should ignore the substantive issue of Tony Grew&#039;s article - helping to stop homophobic bullying in school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True civil partnerships are not marriage &#8211; it is still discrimination.But I don't think we should ignore the substantive issue of Tony Grew's article &#8211; helping to stop homophobic bullying in school.
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6794 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6794', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew (another one)</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html/comment-page-1/#comment-6795</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew (another one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html#comment-6795</guid>
		<description>	thats so true. i&#039;m so glad i&#039;m not the only one who feel partronised by civil partnerships- are there many of us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats so true. i'm so glad i'm not the only one who feel partronised by civil partnerships- are there many of us?
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6795 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6795', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html/comment-page-1/#comment-6796</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html#comment-6796</guid>
		<description>	&#039;separate but equal&#039; principle Americans discarded half a century ago.Huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>'separate but equal' principle Americans discarded half a century ago.Huh?
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6796 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6796', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html/comment-page-1/#comment-6797</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2380.html#comment-6797</guid>
		<description>	Tony, you wrote an excellent article then shot yourself in the head out of sheer stupidity. Do you want to be taken seriously or not?Your statement: &quot;We got what we asked for, we got equality in marriage ...&quot; Bullshit. I&#039;m so tired of reading crap like this from mealy-mouthed apologists. Are you sure you&#039;re the man to call for an effort to stem gay bullying in the schools?You didn&#039;t get marriage equality my friend you got marriage inequality. Gays can&#039;t get married under UK law, marriage is for heterosexuals only.What the UK introduced several months ago with its civil partnerships is an analogous set of laws that govern homosexual relationships. Rather than let you get married like everybody else your government created a form of apartheid: one set of laws for heterosexuals another for homosexuals. This is that vulgar &#039;separate but equal&#039; principle Americans discarded half a century ago.I don&#039;t give a shit how crappy life in the UK was for homosexuals before and how civil partnerships must seem like the Second Coming to you rights starved folks, but you do not have marriage equality yet. Perhaps the next generation can pick up the ball where you dropped it and finish the job. Meanwhile stop bragging about gays having &#039;marriage equality&#039; in the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, you wrote an excellent article then shot yourself in the head out of sheer stupidity. Do you want to be taken seriously or not?Your statement: "We got what we asked for, we got equality in marriage &#8230;" Bullshit. I'm so tired of reading crap like this from mealy-mouthed apologists. Are you sure you're the man to call for an effort to stem gay bullying in the schools?You didn't get marriage equality my friend you got marriage inequality. Gays can't get married under UK law, marriage is for heterosexuals only.What the UK introduced several months ago with its civil partnerships is an analogous set of laws that govern homosexual relationships. Rather than let you get married like everybody else your government created a form of apartheid: one set of laws for heterosexuals another for homosexuals. This is that vulgar 'separate but equal' principle Americans discarded half a century ago.I don't give a shit how crappy life in the UK was for homosexuals before and how civil partnerships must seem like the Second Coming to you rights starved folks, but you do not have marriage equality yet. Perhaps the next generation can pick up the ball where you dropped it and finish the job. Meanwhile stop bragging about gays having 'marriage equality' in the UK.
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6797 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6797', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
