Legislator sues university over gay partner rights
In papers filed this past week, gay legal group Lambda Legal asked the Butler County Court of Common Pleas in Ohio to dismiss a lawsuit brought by a legislator seeking to take away the domestic partner benefits of employees of Miami University because the legislator has no legal standing to sue.
"Mr [Tom] Brinkman has no legal standing to bring this lawsuit because it makes no difference in his daily life when the domestic partners of lesbian and gay university employees have health insurance," said James Madigan, lawyer for Lambda Legal's Midwest Regional Office in Chicago.
"The real people who are helped by this benefit or harmed by its absence are the lesbian and gay employees and their families. Their health ought not be the source of fodder for a politician up for re-election."
The brief argues that Mr Brinkman has no standing to sue, because the University pays for its domestic partner benefits with privately donated funds, not with tax dollars or tuition. He also has not shown that he suffered any direct impact that would be corrected if Miami University took away the health and dental insurance it currently offers to the domestic partners of university employees.
Lambda Legal filed a motion in December 2005 to intervene on behalf of Professors Jean Lynch and Yvonne Keller, after the domestic partner benefits offered by their employer, Miami University, came under attack by the antigay Alliance Defence Fund (ADF). ADF, along with Ohio legislator Thomas Brinkman, is suing the university, claiming that its domestic partner benefits violate Ohio's antigay constitutional amendment, which limits marriage to a man and a woman. The court granted Lambda Legal's request to intervene in the lawsuit on behalf of the two professors, given the impact that the decision of the case would have on them and their families. In the case, Lambda Legal is arguing that Ohio's constitutional amendment does not apply to the university because it concerns only marriage and does not address the legality of domestic partnership benefits.
The case is Brinkman v. Miami University. James P. Madigan, Staff Attorney in Lambda Legal's Midwest Regional Office in Chicago is handling the case with co-counsel, Alphonse Gerhardstein and Jennifer Branch of Gerhardstein, Branch Laufman in Cincinnati, OH.
© 2006 GayWired.com; All Rights Reserved.
Related Articles:
- Exxon rejects gay anti-discrimination policies
- Employee discrimination case sets precedent for gay partner benefits
- Gay domestic partners given benefits
- Attorney appeals to stop gay partner benefits
- Gay marriage supporters protest new bill
- Ford will advertise in gay publications
- Michigan halts equal treatment of gay partners
- Michigan To Offer Gay Partner Benefits








Save to Browser Favorites
Ask
backflip
blinklist
BlogBookmark
Bloglines
BlogMarks
Blogsvine
BUMPzee!
CiteULike
co.mments
Connotea
del.icio.us
DotNetKicks
Digg
diigo
dropjack.com
dzone
Facebook
Fark
Faves
Feed Me Links
Friendsite
folkd.com
Furl
Google
Hugg
Jeqq
Kaboodle
kirtsy
linkaGoGo
LinksMarker
Ma.gnolia
Mister Wong
Mixx
MySpace
MyWeb
Netvouz
Newsvine
PlugIM
popcurrent
Propeller
Reddit
Rojo
Segnalo
Shoutwire
Simpy
Slashdot
Sphere
Sphinn
Spurl.net
Squidoo
StumbleUpon
Technorati
ThisNext
Webride
Windows Live
Yahoo!
Email This to a Friend
If you like this then please subscribe to the 














1 Comment on Legislator sues university over gay partner rights