<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#039;s blockade of PinkNews.co.uk leaves unanswered questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-11372.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-11372.html/</link>
	<description>PinkNews.co.uk Gay News (UK and world) from Pink News - all the gay news for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community in the UK and beyond- thegaynews from Pink News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:26:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Masters</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-11372.html/comment-page-1/#comment-44847</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Masters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-11372.html#comment-44847</guid>
		<description>Sue Google for all losses, google is responsible for ALL losses, and must be held responsible, at court, as google is NOT the cyberpolice, nor is entitled to block sites on its own decision!
Only authorities can and should be allowed to block sites, based on court decisions, and not privately owned entities with possible exterior motives, like fi competition!
I think it is unacceptable that one org can be deciding about blocking a site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue Google for all losses, google is responsible for ALL losses, and must be held responsible, at court, as google is NOT the cyberpolice, nor is entitled to block sites on its own decision!<br />
Only authorities can and should be allowed to block sites, based on court decisions, and not privately owned entities with possible exterior motives, like fi competition!<br />
I think it is unacceptable that one org can be deciding about blocking a site!
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=44847 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=44847', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirat</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-11372.html/comment-page-1/#comment-44782</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-11372.html#comment-44782</guid>
		<description>Just a guess, but probably try to look into the ads that are on the web page.
I was quite frustrated at not being able to read PinkNews (as I do quite often), though my frustration was lifted just a tad when I remembered the same thing happening to another site I was rather fond of.
The culprit on the other site happened to be an ad on the pages. Some advertisers tend to take advantage of carpet-bombing exploits (placing files on computers without the users&#039; intention).
This is, sadly, not an isolated issue, as many websites have had ads on the page that express malicious intent on unsuspecting users..

If it wasn&#039;t an ad, then I&#039;m clueless.
Oh and, glad to have the site back to normal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a guess, but probably try to look into the ads that are on the web page.<br />
I was quite frustrated at not being able to read PinkNews (as I do quite often), though my frustration was lifted just a tad when I remembered the same thing happening to another site I was rather fond of.<br />
The culprit on the other site happened to be an ad on the pages. Some advertisers tend to take advantage of carpet-bombing exploits (placing files on computers without the users' intention).<br />
This is, sadly, not an isolated issue, as many websites have had ads on the page that express malicious intent on unsuspecting users..</p>
<p>If it wasn't an ad, then I'm clueless.<br />
Oh and, glad to have the site back to normal!
<p align="right"><b><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=44782 title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://www.pinknews.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=44782', 400, 400)">(Report comment to the moderator)</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
