Procreation comes before gay rights, judge says
The US government's policy of promoting procreation should overrule gay rights, according to a panel of federal judges.
Judge Jerome Farris told a gay couple suing Orange County, for the right to get married, that "everything that is wrong is not discrimination."
The two men are calling California's ban on gay marriage unconstitutional because it treats gays and lesbians differently to heterosexuals.
One of the judges, Gary Taylor, ruled against their case at the US Circuit Court of Appeals, recognising the law "has a disproportionate effect on homosexual individuals," but said procreation is more important.
Mr Farris said: "I think marriage is a bundle of sticks and sticks include procreation."
Richard Gilbert, the gay couple's lawyer, said procreation is not the most important part of marriage, and one of the judges, Sidney Thomas appeared to agree.
Mr Thomas said: "I don't understand, really, the procreation argument."
The complainants, Arthur Smelt and Christopher Hammer, have vowed to take their case all the way to the Supreme Court.
Related Articles:








Save to Browser Favorites
Ask
backflip
blinklist
BlogBookmark
Bloglines
BlogMarks
Blogsvine
BUMPzee!
CiteULike
co.mments
Connotea
del.icio.us
DotNetKicks
Digg
diigo
dropjack.com
dzone
Facebook
Fark
Faves
Feed Me Links
Friendsite
folkd.com
Furl
Google
Hugg
Jeqq
Kaboodle
kirtsy
linkaGoGo
LinksMarker
Ma.gnolia
Mister Wong
Mixx
MySpace
MyWeb
Netvouz
Newsvine
PlugIM
popcurrent
Propeller
Reddit
Rojo
Segnalo
Shoutwire
Simpy
Slashdot
Sphere
Sphinn
Spurl.net
Squidoo
StumbleUpon
Technorati
ThisNext
Webride
Windows Live
Yahoo!
Email This to a Friend
If you like this then please subscribe to the 















No Comments Yet on Procreation comes before gay rights, judge says