What’s The Word? The Bible On Gay Marriage

Listen Now [30 min 19 sec] &;Talk of the Nation, December 15, 2008 · often cite as the basis for their to . , of the Southern and host of the Program, believes a strict reading of the text forbids . But , editor at , contends the ’s of are flawed, and its lessons about actually argue for .

&;See What’s The Word? The Bible On Gay Marriage
NPR

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2008/12/whats-word-bi…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Video: Newsweek’s religious case for gay marriage

’s provocative cover story this week explores what the really says about people, , even .

editor talked to scholars who say neither or the ever explicitly define as between one man and one woman.

“The ’s view of is nothing …

Read more….

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

NEWSWEEK COVER: The Religious Case for Gay Marriage - “Religious Objections to Gay Marriage are Rooted Not in the Bible at All”

Shows Two-Thirds of People Who See as a Oppose it

NEW YORK,&;NY — The latest shows growing public support for and , with a number of factors playing a role in swaying people one way or the other. According to the , 62 percent of Americans say play an important role in shaping their views on . “According to the survey, two-thirds of those who see as primarily a support . On the other hand, two-thirds of those who see it as mostly a (or equal parts religious and legal) oppose .” Editor examines this issue in the December 15 cover, “The for ” (on Monday, December 8), and writes that “not since 1860, when the country’s were full of preachers pronouncing on slavery, pro and con, has one of our basic social (and economic) institutions been so subject to Biblical scrutiny … All the , it seems, has been on the side of the - opponents, who use as the foundation for their objections.” A of scriptural authority requires the ability to move beyond , as common and evolves over time. “ to are rooted not in the at all, then, but in custom and tradition,” Miller writes.

Miller writes that the argument against involves the idea that the and define as between one man and one woman, and homosexuality is in to . To which there are two obvious responses: First, neither the nor says any such thing. And second, no sensible modern person wants — theirs or anyone else’s — to look in its particulars anything like what the describes. “‘’ in America refers to two separate things, a religious institution and a civil one, though it is most often enacted as a messy conflation of the two. As a civil institution, offers practical benefits to both partners: contractual rights having to do with taxes; ; the care and custody of children; ; and inheritance. As a religious institution, offers something else: a commitment of both partners before God to , honor, cherish each other — in sickness and in , for richer and poorer — in accordance with God’s will.” Miller argues that the offers no reason why should not be married, in both civil and religious terms — and a number of excellent reasons why they should.

“We cannot look to the as a manual, but we can read it for universal truths as we struggle toward a more just future,” Miller writes. “The offers inspiration and warning on the subjects of , , family and community. It speaks eloquently of the crucial role of families in a fair society and the risks we incur to ourselves and our children should we cease trying to bind ourselves together in loving pairs.”

Also in the cover package, Senior Writer Lorraine Ali tells the story of a custody battle between who were joined in a Vermont civil union. Their relationship failed, one partner decided she was no longer and now they’re fighting for custody of the daughter they both . The case, Miller v. Jenkins, has important implications for parents everywhere.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2008/12/newsweek-cove…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gay Blogads

website stats