Lambda Legal Defends Lesbian Mother in Ohio Custody Matter - ‘These children have a right to the love and support of both parents.’

(Cleveland, Ohio, January 21, 2009) — In court papers submitted in the Ohio Eighth District , defended a mother in her fight to continue to parent her 11 and 8 year old sons.
“These children have a right to the and support of both of their ,” said Taylor Senior in ’s in Chicago. “The Ohio already has said that Ohio’s does not prevent a same- couple from sharing custody of the children they are rearing together. We shouldn’t have to this hurtful and discriminatory argument any longer. The below in this case did the right thing by focusing on the needs of the children, and awarding shared custody to these women based on more than a century of Ohio allowing such orders.”
represents Rita in her pursuit to continue to parent her two sons. and her former Siobhan LaPiana were in a committed for 10 years. During that time the women planned and had two children. LaPiana gave birth to the children but both women equally parented the boys, who and rely on both of them as their mothers. Before the birth of the first child, and LaPiana drafted and signed a agreement detailing their intent to share all . After the couple split, LaPiana began restricting ’s time with the boys. In February 2007, filed a lawsuit, and in August, 2008, the ordered visitation for . LaPiana appealed, arguing, among other things, that Ohio’s prevents courts from entering orders permitting former partners to , and that the court’s order unconstitutionally infringed on her right to as a parent.
argues that Ohio’s has no impact on Ohio courts’ authority to order shared custody between former same- partners. Additionally, argues that because LaPiana agreed to co-parent her children from birth with , it is constitutional for courts to step in to protect the children’s bonded to .&;&;
On December 31, 2008, in the case, In re J.D.F., the Ohio rejected a similar effort by a in a custody dispute with her former to use Ohio’s as a weapon to sever the parental between her child and her former .&;&;
“This has always been about my sons and making sure they can rely on both of their . I made a promise to take care of them always — and I’m just trying to make good on that promise,” said client Rita .
represents Rita along with cooperating attorney Pamela J. MacAdams, of
Taylor, Senior is handling the case for . She is joined by co-counsel
Pamela J. MacAdams of Morganstern, MacAdams &; DeVito Co., LPA, in Cleveland, Ohio.
The case is In re S.J.L. and J.K.L.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/01/lambda-legal-…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ohio Supreme Court Allows Custody Decision to Stand in Lambda Legal Case Representing Lesbian Mother

‘The Court has expressly shut down arguments that Ohio’s amendment impacts and , rights, and responsibilities’

&;

(Columbus, OH, January 5, 2009) –The of Ohio last week let stand an ruling affirming the enforceability of a court-approved agreement in a case involving mothers.

“The Court has expressly shut down arguments that Ohio’s amendment impacts and , rights, and responsibilities,”said Taylor, Senior in ’s in Chicago. “The Court correctly declined an to treat and Ohio differently from other families, and to deprive the children of these families of the protections and support other children receive.”

represents Therese Leach in her fight to uphold a court-approved agreement signed by both her and her former , Denise , in 2001. After their son was born in 1996, both women parented him. In order to ensure that Therese had a protected legal with the child, the signed a agreement. &;Such agreements were approved by the Ohio in the 2001 In re Bonfield case in which participated. &;

The decision comes after argued, at a , and the Ohio for the Tenth District, that Ohio’s limiting to a man and a invalidated the court approved she originally sought with Leach. All three courts brushed aside ’s arguments, ruling that court-approved custody agreements cannot be ignored or unilaterally undone by one of the . In July 2008, asked the Ohio to hear her case, and urged the Court to refuse. Today’s order from the high court is the on the matter.

The case is In re J.D.F.

Taylor, Senior Attorney in ’s in Chicago is counsel on the appeal. She is joined by co-counsel LeeAnn Massucci of Massucci &; Kline LLC and Thomas Schmidt of Gahanna, Ohio.

###

Erin Baer 212-809-8585 ext 267; Cell: 646-752-3251

&; &; &; &; &; &; &; &;

is a national committed to achieving full recognition of the of , men, bisexuals, and those with through impact litigation, and public policy work.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/01/ohio-supreme-…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Iowa Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Lambda Legal’s Case Seeking Marriage for Same-Sex Couples

‘We put our best case forward, and hope that the Court breathes life into the promise of guaranteed in the Iowa .’
(Des Moines, December 9, 2008) — Today the Iowa heard in ’s case on behalf of six Iowa same- couples and their families who are seeking the right to marry.
&;”We put our best case forward, and hope that the Court breathes life into the Iowa ’s promise of ,” said Taylor, Senior and of the lawsuit based in ’s in Chicago.
&;”Iowa has a long, of protecting individual rights. The government has no business standing in the way of a loving same- couple who wants to take responsibility for each other and their family,” said , former Iowa General and at the firm who argued the case on behalf of ’s clients.
&;”My grandparents were married 68 years and ’s grandparents were married 57 years. My family values the importance of and commitment and I learned that lesson very early—it’s a lesson I want to pass on to our son,” said Ingrid Olson, plaintiff in the lawsuit along with her Evans and their son .
In December 2005, filed a lawsuit with the Polk County Court on behalf of six same- couples who were denied licenses in Iowa, arguing that denying to same- couples violates the liberty and guarantees in the Iowa State . In August of 2007 the district court ruled that denying to same- couples is unconstitutional. In March 2008, 15 friend-of-the- were filed supporting same- couples seeking the right to marry, and the right of their children not to have their families branded as inferior. Those briefs were signed by hundreds of Iowans including former Lieutenant Governors Joy Corning and Sally Pederson. To learn more about the briefs visit: http://www.lambdalegal.org/news/pr/iowa-amicus-filing.html. The final decision in this case will be made by the Iowa .
clients attending the argument: Kate and Trish Varnum of Cedar Rapids; David Twombley and Larry Hoch of Urbandale; Dawn and Jen BarbouRoske and their daughter McKinley of Iowa City; Ingrid Olson and Evans of Council Bluffs; Jason Morgan and Chuck Swaggerty of Sioux City; and Bill Musser and Otter Dreaming of Decorah.
Tonight the community will gather to discuss this historic event with remarks by Taylor, ’s Senior and of the lawsuit.
“Making the Case” Des Moines Reception — Tuesday, December 9, 2008 - 6:30-8:00 PM Pappajohn Center, 1200 Grand Ave., Des Moines.
and One Iowa are hosting a series of town hall meetings across the state about the and the lawsuit. For a list of dates and cities, please visit http://www.lambdalegal.org/take-action/events/iowa-town-hall.html.
The Iowa case is: Varnum v. Brien
Taylor, Senior and Kenneth Upton, Jr., Supervising Senior are handling the case for .&; They are joined by former Iowa General of in Des Moines.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2008/12/iowa-supreme-…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gay Blogads

website stats