Obama begins to reshape bench

(Washington) President Barack Obama nominated a moderate Indiana judge Tuesday to serve on a Midwestern federal appeals court, his first step toward reshaping the federal judiciary and preparing for a possible Supreme Court opening.

The White House chose U.S. District Judge David Hamilton of Indiana for the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit …

DOMA threatened by judge’s ruling?

Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the federal government’s denial of benefits to the same-sex spouse of a public defender lacks “rational basis” and is therefore unconstitutional. The ruling isn’t applicable as precedent because it resolved an internal dispute within the federal judiciary and not an actual lawsuit. Still, the decision was seen by some observers as challenging the Defense of Marriage Act. Los Angeles Times/L.A. Now blog (free registration

Published by

Original source : http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/02/doma-threaten…

Rulings on gay couples’ benefits question Defense of Marriage Act

Two judges’ decisions don’t extend beyond the two couples in question because the rulings came in the federal court’s administrative dispute process, rather than in lawsuit judgments.

Brad Levenson and Tony Sears spent Thursday fielding congratulatory calls from gay rights supporters around the nation for their success in getting a federal judge to call into question the legality of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act.

Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled earlier this week that Sears — who married Levenson, a deputy federal public defender, last July — is entitled to the same spousal benefits that heterosexual couples employed by the department receive.

But the Silver Lake couple aren’t celebrating yet.

“I’m not convinced this is over,” Levenson said of their long-running battle to be treated like a married couple. “But it pushes the conversation forward.”

Reinhardt’s ruling branded the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional. The 9th Circuit’s chief judge, Alex Kozinski, also weighed in on the subject last month, granting benefits to the same-sex spouse of a staff attorney for the court. But he stopped short of basing that decision on constitutional grounds.

Despite the prominence of the two judges, the rulings are legally meaningless for all but the two couples because they came in the court’s administrative dispute process, rather than in lawsuit judgments.

The 9th Circuit judges ruled in their capacity as dispute-resolution officials within the federal judiciary, whose employees are prohibited from suing in federal court.

Levenson and Sears see Reinhardt’s order as a step along the road to equality.

But Levenson pointed out Thursday that his attempt to file a new benefits form was rejected by an office computer still programmed to exclude same-sex spouses from even applying.
See Two judges decisions don’t extend beyond the two couples in …
Los Angeles Times – CA,USA