Time to review policy on gays in US military: Powell

American have changed and the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy toward serving in the U.S. military should be reviewed, former Joint chairman said on Sunday.

Barack Obama favors overturning the policy, which bars troops from serving openly in the military. U.S. has asked military to look at ways to make the law more flexible, hailed by rights as a “seismic ”.

“The policy and the law that came about in 1993, I think, was correct for the time,” Powell said on ’s State of the Union.

have now gone by, and I think a has changed with to within our country, and therefore I think this is a policy and a law that should be reviewed.” he added.

See Time to review policy on gays in US military: Powell

* Tags = gay men gay news lesbian news transgender bisexual

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/07/time-to-revie…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Marine General Questions Obama Plan to Study Gay Ban, Scholars Concur that More Study is Unnecessary and Could Have Political Costs

SANTA BARBARA, Calif. — A retired Brigadier General for the U.S. Marine Corps has questioned the administration’s plan to form a Pentagon commission to study “don’t ask, don’t tell.” “There’s been enough studying throughout the years,” said General . “Creating a new study will not change the facts.” Aitken participated in a comprehensive 2008 review of the policy which found that there is no evidence showing that openly service would harm the military, and a great deal of evidence showing it would not.

According to a February 1st Boston report, the administration has decided not to move forward on repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell” until the Pentagon can “undertake a detailed study of how a change in the policy would affect the military.” This may not happen for several months or longer, says the article.

But scholars echoed General Aitken’s argument. Dr. Nathaniel Frank, senior research at the Palm Center and author of the , : How the Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America, said he has reviewed “all of the evidence on in the military, and there is simply no question about whether or not a policy change would undermine unit . It would not.”

Dr. , a well-respected military who co-authored a study on in the military with the late , author of the ban, said, “you don’t need a commission to tell you that you need to retain every able, trained, experienced and at a time when both the stakes and the manpower needs are high.”

Dr. , a UCLA scholar who has authored a number of studies on in the military, agreed that “the to study ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ yet again seems unnecessary. Extensive already shows that allowing the 65,000 and currently in uniform to serve openly will not harm the military in any way.”

Professor Diane Mazur, a former Air Force officer who teaches at the University of Florida and who has published widely on in the military, added that “every research study published over the last fifteen years has concluded that military readiness is not harmed — and may be strengthened — when all qualified Americans can serve and no one has to live in secrecy.”

Relevant research includes an extensive 1993 study by the RAND corporation as well as two official military studies: a 1989 study by the Defense Personnel Security Research Center and the ’s 1957 Crittenden report. It also includes numerous academic studies published in leading military journals such as International Security, Armed Forces and Society, and Parameters, the official journal of the U.S. War College. Most recently, a bi-partisan panel of retired flag officers, which included General Aitken, released a report last year which found that “don’t ask, don’t tell” was unnecessary and harmful to the military. All these studies reached the same : that allowing open service would not undermine the military.

Frank’s new book, which is being called the definitive story of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” chronicles the history of the 1993 debates over service and shows that, even then, the word “study” quickly became code for “delay and kill.” “Sam Nunn said any review of the ban should begin with a ‘Pentagon study’,” said Frank. “ said the should move cautiously and ’study’ the issue; Bob Dole said the should appoint a ’study commission’; and ultimately Clinton called for a 6-month ’study’ period. The result was ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ which has made no one happy. I think there’s a lesson here.”

Dr. Aaron Belkin, director of the Palm Center and a nationally recognized expert on service, said that has stroke-of-the-pen authority to suspend discharges because, while the law mandates discharge if a “finding” is made of conduct, nothing in the law requires that such a finding be made. Given ’s December 2008 showing 81 percent public approval for open service, Belkin said, should not hesitate to end the policy by .

“Ironically, ’s careful effort to avoid Clinton’s mistakes could cause him to repeat them,” he said. “When Clinton called a time-out to study the situation, that allowed forces time to . In some cases, the Pentagon just needs to be told what to do.” Belkin said he has been told privately by top military officials that in cases like this one, they often prefer to be told what to do. “They know it’s the right step,” he said, “and sometimes they’d rather it be made for them.”

The Palm Center is a research institute at the , Santa Barbara. The Center uses rigorous social to inform public discussions of , enabling policy outcomes to be informed more by evidence than by emotion. Its data- approach is premised on the notion that the public makes wise on social issues when high-quality information is available. For more information, visit www.palmcenter.ucsb.edu.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/02/marine-genera…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fire Revives Palin Church’s ‘Ex-Gay’ Scandal

and her church’s are again making headlines — or at least propelling&;conversation.

The ’s church, Baptist Church, literally came under fire this weekend in what appears to be . And, considering the of the incident, one can’t help but wonder whether the church was specifically targeted because of Palin’s long history there. That’s one of the theories, of course, and has brought Palin’s right-leaning beliefs — and past scandals — back into the&;.

As pointed out last week, Palin was certainly a polarizing figure during her short on the . She fired up supporters and burned up critics. But who would hate this enough to her church? Probably plenty of , but some seem to be speculating that the “suspect class” can be narrowed a&;bit.

You may recall that , as were just starting to examine Palin’s background, it came to light that her church had distributed a flyer for Love Won Out, a group that claims it can “cure” gay people. [There was also a in which Palin was accused of asking her local library to remove -themed books from its shelves when she was mayor. She denied the charge.] Obviously were not amused and called on Mrs. Palin to explain herself. It became a small thorn in her side, and one that Palin tried to avoid. Sure, the topic came up a bit, but it never became the it could have during , when the raged. Well, the topic came up last night when Palin sat down with Fox News’s Greta van Susteren.&;&;See Fire Revives Palin Church’s ‘Ex-Gay‘ Scandal
,&;NY

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2008/12/fire-revives-…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gay Blogads

website stats