Nations allowing gays to serve openly in military

(New York) Nations that allow and lesbians to serve openly in their , as compiled by the Center at the , Santa Barbara:

Australia

Austria

Britain

Canada

Estonia

France

Germany

Ireland

Italy

Luxembourg

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

Read more….

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

House Dems urge Obama to halt gay discharges from the military

WASHINGTON _ In the most vocal for the to take the in allowing to serve openly in the military, 76 Democratic today urged to use his to order a halt to military under the controversial “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law and work aggressively with to pass new to overturn what they describe as a that harms .

“We you to the maximum legally possible in administering Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell until repeals the law,” states the letter, organized by Rep. , a of California. “To this end, we ask that you direct the Armed Services not to initiate any investigation of service personnel to determine their , and that you instruct them to disregard third party that do not allege violations of the .”

A recent study by the Center, a at the , Santa Barbara, argued that has the authority as commander-in-chief to suspend the discharge process through an .

See House Dems urge Obama to halt gay discharges from the military

* Tags = gay men gay news lesbian news transgender bisexual

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/06/house-dems-ur…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Study Says Obama Can Halt Gay Discharges With Executive Order

Experts Chart Course to End 16-Year Ban

SANTA BARBARA, Calif. — A study released today by a team of experts shows that the has the to end with a single order. The idea of ending the ban by has gained in the wake of news that mission-critical personnel, including speaker Dan Choi, continue to be fired under the administration because they’re . endorsed an to end the ban on Saturday and was asked about it by on . The report, “How to End Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: A of Political, Legal, Regulatory, and Organizational Steps to ,” is sponsored by the Center at the , Santa Barbara.

Many have argued that only can lift the ban on service by openly troops. But according to the study, is not needed. Dr. Aaron , Director of the Center and a study co-author, said “The administration does not want to move forward on this issue because of from both parties in , and does not want to move forward without a signal from the . This study provides a recipe for breaking through the , as well as a for once the civilians give the green light.”

There are three legal bases to the ’s authority, the report says. First, has already granted to the the to halt under 10 U.S.C. 12305, a law which titled, “Authority of to suspend certain laws relating to promotion, retirement, and separation.” Under the law, the may suspend any of law relating to promotion, retirement, or separation applicable to any member of the who the determines is essential to the of the during a “period of national emergency.” The statute specifically defines a “national emergency” as a time when “ of a reserve component are serving involuntarily on active duty.”

The second and third bases of presidential authority are contained within the “don’t ask, don’t tell” itself. The law to the Defense Department authority to determine the process by which will be carried out, saying they will proceed “under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, in accordance with procedures set forth in such regulation.” Finally, the law calls for the discharge of service if a finding of is made, but it does not require that such a finding ever be made. According to the study, these mean that the , not , has the “authority to devise and implement the procedures under which those findings may be made.”

Diane H. Mazur, Professor of Law at the University of Florida College of Law and another study co-author, said the presidential authority to stop firing troops, known as “stop-loss,” is different from the highly unpopular stop-loss policy that the recently announced it would phase out. “That use of stop-loss forcibly extends service by those who wish to leave the military,” she said, “whereas suspending for would do the opposite: allow ongoing service by those who wish to remain in uniform.” The study says the of the stop-loss law, which are granted by , are “sensible because they give the authority to suspend laws relating to separation when a national emergency has strained personnel requirements.”

The other four authors of the study in addition to Mazur and are Dr. Nathaniel Frank, a researcher and author of “: How the Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America”; Dr. Gregory M. Herek, Professor of Psychology at the , Davis; Dr. Elizabeth L. Hillman, Professor of Law at the Hastings College of the Law; and Bridget J. Wilson, who practices law at Rosenstein Wilson &; in . The report will also be published in a , “Department of Defense Social Policy Perspectives 2010,” edited by James Parco, David Levy and Fred Blass.

The Center is a research institute at the , Santa Barbara. The Center uses rigorous social to inform of controversial , enabling to be informed more by evidence than by . Its data- approach is premised on the notion that the public makes wise on when high-quality information is available. For more information, visit www.palmcenter.ucsb.edu * Tags = gay men gay news lesbian news transgender bisexual

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/05/new-study-say…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Experts Question Obama Plan to Consult Military on Gays, Consultations Could Backfire As In 1993

Some experts are questioning ’s effort to consult with as he plans to repeal the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. The AP reported today that “has begun consulting his top defense advisers on how to lift a ban.” But Dr. Nathaniel Frank, author of a new book on the policy, says that “ consulted with the military on this issue, the brass still claimed they had not been consulted, and the result was a . Remember, Clinton insisted he was consulting on how, not whether, to lift the ban, and even so, we got ‘don’t ask, don’t tell.’”

Frank’s new book presents never-reported evidence indicating that who wrote the blueprint for “don’t ask, don’t tell” based the policy “on nothing” but their “own prejudices and .” The book, “: How the Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America,” which was released today, contains the largest collection of evidence showing openly service does not undermine . Frank is Senior Research at the Center at the , Santa Barbara.

Last month, a retired General questioned a similar administration to study “don’t ask, don’t tell.” “There’s been enough studying throughout the years,” said General . “Creating a new study will not change the facts.”

The Center is a research institute at the , Santa Barbara. The Center uses rigorous social to inform of controversial , enabling to be informed more by evidence than by . Its data- approach is premised on the notion that the public makes wise on when high-quality information is available. For more information, visit www.palmcenter.ucsb.edu.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/03/experts-quest…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gay Blogads

website stats