Update: Obama disses marriage law as Justice defends it

(Washington) President insisted Monday he still wants to scrap what he calls a discriminatory federal law, even as his administration angered rights activists by defending it in court.

The president said his administration’s stance in a California is not about defending traditional , but is …

Read more….

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

California court upholds marriage ban; existing unions still legal

The California today upheld a that amended the state to deny rights to and . But the ruling did confirm the legality of 18,000 that were conducted between the time of a previous judicial order and the November election. Los Angeles Times (5/26) , ABC News (5/26) , San Jose Mercury News (Calif.)

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/05/california-co…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Prop 8 ruling moves to federal court

(San Francisco, California) Hours after California’s top court upheld Proposition 8, the voter approved ban on same- , a was filed arguing that Prop 8 violates the U.S. of equal protection and .

The lawsuit seeks a against California’s Proposition 8 until the case is resolved.

The …

Read more….

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Anger, frustration over Prop 8 ruling

(San Francisco, California) As word of Tuesday’s California ruling on Proposition 8 spread to the outside a thunderous moan went up.

Hundreds of on both sides of the issue were gathered outside the court as the justices released their ruling upholding Prop 8, but allowing those

Read more….

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Prayer Service on the EVE of Decision Day – Monday, May 25 Grace Cathedral (1100 California Street San Francisco), 7:00 – 8:30 pm

PROP 8 DECISION DAY IS ON MAY 26, TUESDAY!

Decision Day is on Tuesday, May 26!!!

From the CA website: “The California has announced that it will issue an opinion in three cases challenging the of Proposition 8 at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, May 26, 2009. (Strauss v. Horton, S168047; Tyler v. , S168066; City and County of v. Horton, S168078.) Tuesday at 10 a.m., the opinion will be available on the Web site at this link: http://www..com/l/;http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/.”

You are invited to the following :

1. Service on the of Decision Day – Monday, May 25
(1100 ), 7:00 – 8:30 pm

The night before the announcement of the CA ’s decision, we invite the Bay Area community to come for an evening of songs and meditation that will center our hearts on peace, healing and understanding.

2. Service/Blessing on Decision Day – Tuesday, May 26
St. Francis (152 Church St. , across from ), 8:30 – 9:15 am

The morning of the decision, we invite the Bay Area community to come for encouraging and words from , testimonies from married and for those who will be doing . We will march in a from the church to Plaza. Some will join the march from the Center on Market and .

NOTE: We request to come in their as appropriate for their . Please come at 8:00am to prepare.

CONTACT: Rev. Roland at rstringfellow@clgs.org

3. Circle of Care – Tuesday, May 26, Plaza

If Proposition 8 is upheld, we will surround those who are willing to be arrested in civic disobedience as we sing, and move aside as they are arrested.

is not just a nice idea for some. To deny it is a form of bashing. On Decision Day, a group of will participate in if the upholds Prop 8. In with an interfaith group of , we’ll do a peaceful street blockade with the message SEPARATE IS NOT EQUAL!

We’re looking for to participate in this action with us, and for who will support us as peacekeepers and legal . For more information, please action@onestruggleonefight.com.

SPONSORED BY:

Bay Area Coalition of Welcoming
California for
Congregation Sha’ar Zahav
Fellowship of the Rainbow
Progressive
Jewish Mosaic - The National Center for Sexual and Gender
California Council of

The Fellowship
Metropolitan Community Church of
in Christ Church of
Center for and Studies of Pacific School of
California

Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry California
Glide Memorial

St. Francis
One , One Fight
Nueva Vida Ministries
The Society of Franciscan Workers
API
PANA Institute of Pacific School of
Network on and Justice for API LGBTQ
——————–
See * Tags = gay men gay news lesbian news transgender bisexual

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/05/prayer-servic…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Prop. 8 hoax flies through the Net

It came on a feed, a link from ’s web site saying that had been affirmed by the California . Within minutes everyone remotely concerned with the issue was cross posting it across . We were about to post it to the site when suddenly we realized it was either a or the product of over enthusiasm.

, not fact checking, revealed that the link was to the second page of an Report from 5/15/08, exactly one year old. Since the year was left off on the second page of the article and the everyone blindly assumed it was new. Without that critical bit of information, lit up and passed the information along without digging any further. The story reached a peak around 11:37 this morning when posted it.

See Prop. 8 hoax flies through the Net

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/05/prop-8-hoax-f…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bill Making Identification Change More Accessible for Transgender Persons Passes Key Assembly Committee, Moves One Step Closer to Becoming State Law

Sacramento – The Equal ID took one step closer to becoming law today when it passed the by a 7-3 . The bill, sponsored by California () and introduced by Lieu (D – ), increases the legal rights and recognition enjoyed by by clarifying that qualified born in California can return to the county of their birth to obtain a court order reflecting their correct gender and accompanying name change. The court order is then used to obtain a corrected California .

“All deserve that accurately reflects who they are,” Geoff Kors said. “Once passed, this law will make it easier for both in California and beyond to obtain , apply for , and live their lives as full and equal of society.”

Until recently, only allowed persons to the court for an order recognizing a change of gender in the county in which they presently reside. Last month, the Law Center successfully challenged the in the California . In Somers v. , the court held that the violated the equal protection rights of California-born residing out of state. The Equal ID is the next step in ensuring that all are able to obtain accurate .

“The Equal ID would bring the and up to date with ,” said Kristina Wertz, of the Law Center. “It would alleviate any and ensure that California-born residing in other states know that they, too, can be afforded the of a that reflects who they truly are.”

The new bill ensures that born in California know that they can return to the county of their birth to obtain a corrected . It also provides greater access to persons living in the state, allowing them for first time to the court in their home counties.

“The Equal ID would make it clear to others in my situation that they can go back to the counties in which they were born to get a court order changing their gender. It would save all the trouble I went through finding and spending nearly four years in the courts,” said Gigi Marie Somers, who testified at this morning’ hearing. Ms. Somers, a born in California, was unable to obtain a new in the , where she now resides. Ms. Somers was the in the legal action brought by the Law Center.

“The rights of should not end at our state’s borders,” Leiu said. “The Equal ID makes certain every Californian has the and liberty to be true to his or herself.”

are used as primary source of identification and are often necessary to secure other forms of identification, including cards and .
-30-
California () is the largest statewide , , , -rights advocacy in California. In the past , has strategically moved California from a state with extremely limited for individuals to a state with some of the most comprehensive civil-rights protections in the nation. has passed over of and continues to advance through legislative advocacy, public and . www.eqca.org
The Law Center (TLC) is a advocating for communities. TLC uses direct legal services, , community organizing, and advocacy to transform California into a state that recognizes and supports the needs of and their families. www.transgenderlawcenter.org

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/05/bill-making-i…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Any day now the California Supreme Court will issue its ruling on the Prop 8 legal challenge.

Any day now the California will issue its ruling on the Prop 8 .
Join all of us that evening as we gather in our communities across the state (and nation!) either to our , or hopefully, our joy.
Carry an “I Do” rally sign or wear an “I Do” t-shirt to show your support for the freedom to marry.
 
And after the big day, display your sign in your window, your on your car or wear your t-shirt around town to spark the we must have to continue gaining support for the to marry.
Go to supportido.com to make your purchase now and designate which coalition you want the to . It’s a great way to support the many organizations that are working on the ground and behind the scenes to make sure a majority of support the to marry for same- .
We’re all in this together and we all have the same goal. Your purchase of “I Do” gear will directly the closest to your .
And when the court rules, for better or worse, we’ll be ready.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/05/any-day-now-c…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Calif. high court OKs lesbian students expulsion

(Riverside, California) The California will let stand an ruling that a was within its rights when it expelled two students for allegedly being .

The case began in 2005 after the school’s principal, Gregory , called the into his office and grilled them on …

Read more….

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Court lets private schools expel lesbians

The state left intact Wednesday a lower-court ruling that said a private religious wasn’t covered by California law and could expel students it believed were .

Over Justice ’s dissent, the court denied review of an appeal by of two who were expelled from a in Riverside County. A for the said the ruling, which is binding on statewide, would allow private schools to discriminate against students on any basis they chose, including and .

The were juniors at California Lutheran in the town of when the principal, Gregory , called them to his office in September 2005 and questioned them separately about their , after another student reported postings on their pages.

suspended the based on their answers, and the school’s directors expelled them a month later. The , who later graduated from another , have not been identified and have not discussed their , said their ’ attorney, .

The sued under the Unruh , a 1959 state law that forbids by businesses. It was amended in 2005 to include based on and someone else’s perception of . State law also prohibits anti- , but that applies only to public schools.

In January, the Fourth District in San Bernardino said the school is not a business but instead a social entitled to follow its principles.

Although have defined such organizations as a and the Rotary Club as businesses covered by the Unruh , the cited a 1998 state ruling that allowed the Boy Scouts to exclude and atheists. Like the Boy Scouts, the said, a private exists mainly to instill its values in young .

 See Court lets private schools expel lesbians

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/04/court-lets-pr…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Next Page →

Gay Blogads

website stats