Unanimous California Supreme Court Rejects Attempt to Limit Discrimination Claims by People with Disabilities

‘The Court’s decision furthers the Unruh ’s purpose to eradicate arbitrary and invidious from California’s .’
(, June 11, 2009) — Today the California unanimously ruled that California’s Unruh does not impose for with disabilities, including living with who seek for .
Statement from Tara , at and a principal author of the friend-of-the court brief submitted urging today’s legal result in Munson v. Del Taco:
“The Court rightly rejected efforts to misread the Unruh to impose which would have harmed all disabled who in , including those living with .

“Real, reliable change for with disabilities has been painfully slow in coming but the high court’s decision today promises greater in California. The Court’s decision furthers the Unruh ’s purpose to eradicate arbitrary and invidious from California’s .
“Though this case does not directly involve living with , the application of this decision will be helpful to all who , which includes many living with .”
Background on Munson v. Del Taco:
Kenneth Munson, a , filed suit against Del Taco, Inc. alleging violations of the federal and California’s Unruh . Munson’s suit is based on claims arising from visits he made to one Del Taco restaurant, where he encountered to his use of the parking and .
Background on Unruh :
California’s Unruh requires that — businesses such as , rental housing, and ’ offices — are open to everyone, without arbitrary based on (including ), (including ), , marital status, race or several other personal characteristics. Similarly, the federal (ADA) forbids denying disabled equal access to public places. In 1992, California revised the Unruh to better protect disabled from by saying that a who proves an ADA violation has also proven a state law violation.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/06/unanimous-cal…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lambda Legal Files Federal Lawsuit Against Assisted Living Facility Following Eviction of HIV-Positive Retired Minister

‘They shunned and rejected him, making him feel like a complete .’

(Little Rock, Ark.) — announced today that it has filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas against Ridge of , an facility.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of 75-year-old Dr. Robert Franke, a provost and Unitarian-Universalist minister, and his daughter, Sara Franke Bowling.

Dr. Franke, who relocated to Little Rock to be closer to his daughter, moved in to Ridge after fulfilling all of its — including submission of medical from a local physician. The next day, however — after realizing Dr. Franke is -positive — Ridge officials abruptly ejected Dr. Franke from the facility. A Ridge told Bowling her father’s could remain, but that the “body” had to be out by the end of the day.

“I was stunned that my was thrown out of his new home,” said Bowling. “The at Ridge were supposed to make sure that he was comfortable and cared for, and instead they shunned and rejected him, making him feel like a complete .”

Dr. Franke requires no special medical attention beyond daily and regular check- with a physician, and Ridge is licensed by the state to provide Dr. Franke with the kind of care he and his daughter were seeking for him.

“Federal and exist to protect from just this sort of ,” said Scott Schoettes, Project for . “Unfortunately, this is something we are seeing far too frequently, all across the country. Those tasked with caring for our loved ones need to know that it is illegal to discriminate against someone with based on outdated and misguided beliefs about its transmission.”

Franke and Bowling are seeking under the , the Arkansas and the Arkansas , as well as an , under those laws and the , preventing Ridge from continuing to engage in this kind of conduct.

“This is about ,” said Franke. “I want to make sure it doesn’t happen to anyone else — because no one should ever be made to feel the way I did.”

Scott Schoettes, Project , and Kenneth Upton, Supervising Senior , are handling the case for . They are joined by co-counsel Gary L. Sullivan of the Tripcony Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas. The case is Robert G. Franke and Sara Franke Bowling v. Parkstone Living Center, Inc., dba Ridge at .

* Tags = gay men gay news lesbian news transgender bisexual

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/05/lambda-legal-…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lambda Legal and ARCW File Federal Lawsuit on Behalf of HIV Positive Woman Denied Surgery by Healthcare Provider

(Milwaukee, WI, February 12, 2009) — and the of Wisconsin () filed a today in the US District Court for the on behalf of , a 35-year-old Wisconsin who was denied surgery to remove her because she has .
in healthcare remains a major problem for living with ,” said , Director of the Legal Services Program at the of Wisconsin (). “In violation of both federal and Wisconsin law, Dr. Steven refused to provide needed medical treatment to our client, .”
and represent who experienced problems with her while incarcerated at Taycheedah Correctional Institution in Fond du Lac. Ultimately, her physician referred her to Dr. Steven at the Fond du Lac Regional Hospital to have her removed.
However, Dr. refused to perform the surgery after learning Ms. is -positive. Some time thereafter, a surgeon at a different medical facility removed Ms. ’s in a laprascopic procedure, which is considered .
“Dr. ’s actions fly in the of ethical behavior for a medical professional,” said Scott Schoettes, with ’s Project. “Long ago, the Centers for Disease and Prevention established that using universal precautions — which are required in all sorts of , including surgeries — makes it extremely unlikely for the to be transmitted in this setting.”
The complaint filed today alleges that the defendants –- Steven M. , M.D., , Inc., and , S.C., violated four different state and federal laws. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the (ADA) and its state law counterpart, which both prohibit by places of public accommodation (including healthcare providers); the Rehabilitation , which requires recipients of federal financial assistance not to discriminate against with disabilities; and a Wisconsin law addressing specifically, which forbids healthcare providers from denying services to (or humiliating and degrading them) based solely on their status.
The case is v. , et al.
Scott Schoettes, Project , is handling the case for . He is joined by co-counsel , of of Wisconsin.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/02/lambda-legal-…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lambda Legal and ARCW File Federal Lawsuit on Behalf of HIV Positive Woman Denied Surgery by Healthcare Provider

(Milwaukee, WI, February 12, 2009) — and the of Wisconsin () filed a today in the US District Court for the on behalf of , a 35-year-old Wisconsin who was denied surgery to remove her because she has .
in healthcare remains a major problem for living with ,” said , Director of the Legal Services Program at the of Wisconsin (). “In violation of both federal and Wisconsin law, Dr. Steven refused to provide needed medical treatment to our client, .”
and represent who experienced problems with her while incarcerated at Taycheedah Correctional Institution in Fond du Lac. Ultimately, her physician referred her to Dr. Steven at the Fond du Lac Regional Hospital to have her removed.
However, Dr. refused to perform the surgery after learning Ms. is -positive. Some time thereafter, a surgeon at a different medical facility removed Ms. ’s in a laprascopic procedure, which is considered .
“Dr. ’s actions fly in the of ethical behavior for a medical professional,” said Scott Schoettes, with ’s Project. “Long ago, the Centers for Disease and Prevention established that using universal precautions — which are required in all sorts of , including surgeries — makes it extremely unlikely for the to be transmitted in this setting.”
The complaint filed today alleges that the defendants –- Steven M. , M.D., , Inc., and , S.C., violated four different state and federal laws. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated the (ADA) and its state law counterpart, which both prohibit by places of public accommodation (including healthcare providers); the Rehabilitation , which requires recipients of federal financial assistance not to discriminate against with disabilities; and a Wisconsin law addressing specifically, which forbids healthcare providers from denying services to (or humiliating and degrading them) based solely on their status.
The case is v. , et al.
Scott Schoettes, Project , is handling the case for . He is joined by co-counsel , of of Wisconsin.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/02/lambda-legal-…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lambda Legal Urges Unbiased Nominees to Fill 54 Federal Bench Vacancies

‘The in nominating should be their commitment to rendering decisions impartially.’
(New York, January 15, 2009) — As day draws near, sent a letter to - and the leadership of the Judiciary Committee, explaining the monumental need for fair and impartial nominees to the who will issues facing the community without .&;&;
“In the coming years, a number of key issues that significantly impact the community are likely to arise in the federal courts,” said , “The in nominating should be their commitment to rendering decisions impartially.”
During his two terms, appointed 326 judges to the .
“It is no secret that the Administration’s goal was to pack the federal courts at all levels with arch- who would be unfriendly to the vigorous protection of — not only for , but for everyone,” said Cathcart.
“To start, - will have 54 vacancies to fill and we hope that those nominees can provide balance to what has become a federal system that is often hostile the community,” added Cathcart.
Today’s letter is a follow-up to a memo provided to the . It urges - to nominate federal justices who adhere to established in cases of importance to the community- including the right to privacy, protection against laws based on , the right to sue in under the (ADA) and protections against , among others.
Finally, the letter seeks to promote through nomination of who represent the nation’s diversity including who identify as , , , , of color, women, and those with public defender and public interest legal backgrounds.
To read the full text of the letter submitted, please visit ’s website www.lambdalegal.org or the version of this press release includes an attached PDF of the letter.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/01/lambda-legal-…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gay Blogads

website stats