Gay and thinking about adopting?

If you are or and thinking about adopting in California, let this serve as a basic review on in California. This is not an exhaustive discussion, but a beginner’s look at what one might consider when thinking about .

In addition to single , California permits joint and second-parent .

There are three types of available in California:

  1. /Open - This type of is generally done without an agency, rather with a and/or a physician to help locate a . The cost for an varies, but typically runs from 10 to 20 .
  2. Foster - This type of process begins by the or becoming licensed as foster first, then getting approved by the agency as prospective adoptive . The foster is the most affordable, usually consisting of for licensing, home study and fees.
  3. International - When a U.S. family adopts a child from a foreign country, it is known as an “international” . Prospective usually work with a licensed for intercountry . Fees for an international typically range from 10 to 25 .

If you are considering , below are some questions to consider before taking the next steps. If you and your are exploring the idea of together, feel free to use them as discussion starters.

More of Gay and thinking about adopting?

Examiner.com

* Tags = gay men gay news lesbian news transgender bisexual

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/07/gay-and-think…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Anti-gay group allowed to enter Arkansas adoption case

(Little Rock, Arkansas) A judge has ruled that that a lawsuit challenging an banning unmarried from becoming foster or adoptive can proceed -&; and that the group behind the measure can present arguments in the case.

County Chris Piazza dismissed a motion by Arkansas Dustin McDaniel to dismiss the suit. Piazza then accepted an application by&; the to enter the case.

The council was behind the successful past that bans unmarried from adopting or fostering. The American of Arkansas filed suit, challenging the of the law on behalf of a , some straight, some .

See Anti-gay group allowed to enter Arkansas adoption case

365Gay.com&;

&;

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/03/anti-gay-grou…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gay men criticize new adoption, foster care policy

HAMILTON — Grace calls Michael “Daddy,” and calls his Andrew “Dada.”

And as the 2-year-old pedaled around Michael’s feet on her red , Michael said he was “incensed” by a new Children Services policy that he takes to mean he’ll only be used as a foster or because he’s .

The agency quietly created the policy Dec. 8 after Andrew — who asked to not use their last over involving the — adopted Grace after caring for her as a foster father since birth.

The agency’s policy gives traditional married over single or same- in fostering and .

Children said the policy — possibly the only one of its kind in the state — is not meant to discriminate, and the agency didn’t oppose Grace’s .

See Gay men criticize new adoption, foster care policy

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/03/gay-men-criti…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Following Attorney General Investigation, Arizona-based Antigay Adoption Service Stops Business in New York: Lambda Legal’s Clients Vindicated

.com and Parentprofiles.com, national parent posting websites, discriminate based on .
(New York, March 4, 2009) — In an announcement issued today by New York Andrew Cuomo, the Arizona-based , LLC and Media, LLC stopped doing business in New York.
The ’s announcement follows a complaint filed by on behalf of a New York couple barred from posting their on-line adoptive-parent by the companies in question solely because they are a same- couple. , LLC and Media, LLC were violating New York laws prohibiting such .
“New York Cuomo has sent a clear message to all businesses that on the basis of will not be tolerated,” said , at . “Companies can’t come into New York and hang a sign on their door saying ‘Same- need not apply.’”
clients Rosario Gennaro and Gardner knew for a that they wanted to have children and that was the way to make it possible. The couple had a home study by a licensed and obtained certification as Qualified Adoptive from the Surrogate Court. The couple wanted to post their on ParentProfiles.com and seek a match with a . However, the website’s eligibility requirements only allow a “Qualifying Husband and Wife Couple” that are “one male husband and one female wife” to use the service, thus discriminating against same- on the basis of , and marital status. The company was sued in California for violating that state’s law and is no longer doing business there.
“We are thrilled that the New York ’s office made the right decision and that no couple will have to experience what we did in our effort to become ,” said Rosario Gennaro.

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/03/following-att…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

ACLU Asks Court To Strike Down Arkansas Parenting Ban

LITTLE ROCK– The American today filed a lawsuit seeking to strike down a new law that bans any who lives with a from serving as an adoptive or in the .&;
&;
At a press conference at the Arkansas this morning, several of the described how Act 1, which is set to go into effect on January 1, impacts their families and why they decided to be part of the case.
&;
Stephanie , who already adopted one child from the state in 2004, was one of the who spoke at today’s press conference. and her of 10 years, Wendy Rickman, want to adopt another child or a pair of through the Department of Children and Family Services, but now can’t because of Act 1.&; “The state already knows we’re good enough that they placed one child with us before Act 1 passed,” said .&; “Who knows how many children are now cut off by this law from loving homes?”
&;
In the lawsuit filed today, the argues that Act 1 violates the federal and state to equal protection and .&; Participating in the case are 29 and children from over a dozen different families, including a who lives with her same- of and is the only relative able and willing to adopt her grandchild who is now in Arkansas state care, several married who have relatives or friends disqualified by Act 1 who they want to adopt their children if they die, and a who wants to be a foster or but can’t because she lives with her of five years. The complaint was filed this morning in .
&;
“Ever since the election, we’ve been hearing from all corners of the state from of families who are panicking about how Act 1 impacts them,” said , of the of Arkansas.&; “This law hurts families and children in many ways – it takes away ’ right to decide for themselves who will adopt their children if they die, it denies the many children in Arkansas state care a chance at the largest possible pool of potential foster and adoptive homes, and denies who are living together but unmarried the chance to provide loving homes to children who desperately need them.”&;
&;
Among the and their families are:
&;
Sheila Cole: Sheila lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma with Jennifer, her of . Sheila’s daughter from an earlier had a baby girl in May of 2008 who was placed in the Arkansas system when she was two months old. Sheila wants to adopt her granddaughter and is the relative best able to take in the baby. Every week she makes a four-hour round trip to Bentonville for two hours of visitation with her granddaughter. Sheila has taken foster classes with Oklahoma’s DHS and has passed a home study.&; She is now waiting for approval from Arkansas, but she’s worried she might not be approved to adopt her own granddaughter because of Act 1.
&;
Stephanie and Wendy Rickman: Stephanie and Wendy have been together for 10 years and are raising two sons together, one of whom is a 7-year-old with special needs whom Stephanie adopted from the state in 2004. Stephanie and Wendy want to adopt another child, or perhaps a pair of , but can’t because of Act 1.
&;
Frank Pennisi and Matt Harrison; Meredith and Benny Scroggin: Frank and Matt have been together for eight years and live together in Little Rock and would like to become foster or adoptive .&; Matt’s cousin, Meredith Scroggin, and her husband Benny want Frank and Matt to be able to adopt their two daughters in the event of their death.
&;
Cary and Trina Kelley: Cary and his wife, Trina, have two young daughters and live across the road in Fayetteville from Cary’s mother Vickie Kelley and her Sophia Estes.&; Sophia and Vickie have been together 16 years, and cumulatively have three children and six grandchildren.&; If anything were to happen to Cary and Trina, who held their wedding in Vickie and Sophia’s backyard, they want Vickie and Sophia to be able to adopt their children.&; Trina, Cary’s wife, spent many years of her childhood in state care and she feels very strongly that children who need homes shouldn’t be cut off from loving relatives like Sophia and Vickie.
&;
Kaytee Wright: Kaytee Wright lives on a farm in Cabot with her of five years, Alan Leveritt.&; Kaytee helps Alan raise his eight-year-old daughter from his previous , of whom he has joint custody.&; Together she and Alan are also providing a home and financial assistance to a mother and her two young children through a Little Rock shelter for the working homeless.&; Kaytee was adopted from state care when she was just four weeks old, and she feels very strongly that good homes should be provided to children in the state system.&; Kaytee would like to adopt a child but cannot because she and Alan aren’t married.&;&;
&;
For a complete list of all the plaintiff families and more detailed , please visit http://www.aclu.org/lgbt/parenting/38199res20081230.html
&;
The are represented by Christine P. Sun, Rose Saxe, and Leslie Cooper of the American , Stacey , Garrard Beeney, and Jennifer Sheinfeld of Sullivan &; Cromwell LLP, and Marie-Bernarde Miller and Daniel J. Beck of Williams &; Anderson PLC on behalf of the Foundation of Arkansas.
&;
The case is Cole, et al. v. Arkansas, et al.&; For more information on the case, including today’s complaint, visit http://www.aclu.org/lgbt/parenting/38199res20081230.html

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/01/aclu-asks-cou…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gay Blogads

website stats