NEW FILING IN PROP 8 LEGAL CHALLENGE: Reply brief reiterates that Prop 8 should be struck down

Posted on January 6, 2009 
Filed Under Uncategorized

(, California, January 5, 2009) — Today, the National Center for Rights (NCLR), the American (), and filed a reply brief in the California , the next step in the lawsuit seeking to overturn Proposition 8, which passed by a mere 52 percent on November 4.

The brief argues that Proposition 8 is invalid because it seeks to eliminate a fundamental right only for a targeted minority, which cannot be done through the process. The brief also agrees with that certain fundamental rights, including the right to marry, are inalienable and can not be put up for a popular . The brief also argues —again in agreement with the Attorney General — that Proposition 8 cannot be applied to invalidate existing marriages because and amendments are presumed to apply only on a prospective basis.

“If Prop 8 is permitted to stand, it would be the first time an has successfully been used to change the California to take away an existing right only from a historically targeted minority group,” said NCLR . “Such a change would defeat the very purpose of a and fundamentally alter the role of the courts in protecting .”

On November 19, 2008, the California granted review in the to Proposition 8, and established an expedited briefing schedule, under which briefing will be completed in January 2009, with amicus curiae or “friend-of-the-court” due on January 15. Oral argument potentially could be held as early as March 2009.

, a with the , added “Prop 8 is a radical and to the California that puts all at risk. It actually mandates government against a minority.”

In May of 2008, the California held that laws that treat differently based on their violate the equal protection clause of the California and that same- have the same fundamental right to marry as other . Proposition 8 would completely eliminate this fundamental right only for same- . No other has ever successfully changed the California to take away a right only from a targeted minority group.

“Prop 8 is not valid and never has been,” said Jennifer Pizer, National Project Director. “California’s Equal Protection clause was not written in sand, to be erased by shifting political tides. It’s a solid that we all have the same rights and it’s the foundation of our government. Exceptions can’t be carved by simple majority or the becomes a . No can cause such a profound change in our legal system.”

NCLR, , and the filed this challenge on November 5, representing California, whose include many same- who married between June 16 and November 4, 2008, and six same- who want to marry in California. The California has also agreed to hear two other challenges filed on the same day: one filed by the City and County of (joined by Santa Clara County and the City of Los Angeles, and subsequently by and other local governments); and another filed by a private attorney. These three cases are jointly under review by the California .

Serving as co-counsel on the case with NCLR, , and the are the Law Office of David C. Codell, Munger, Tolles &; Olson LLP, and Orrick, Herrington &; Sutcliffe LLP.

For more information on this case, go to: http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme/highprofile/prop8.htm

###

The National Center for Rights is a national legal committed to advancing the civil and of , , , and and their families through litigation, public policy advocacy, and public .&;www.nclrights.org

is a national committed to achieving full recognition of the of , men, bisexuals, and those with through impact litigation, and public policy work.&;www.lambdalegal.org
&;
The American is America’s foremost of . It fights and moves public opinion on rights through the courts, legislatures and public .
www.aclu.org

works to achieve and secure for . To improve the lives of , sponsors legislation and coordinates efforts to ensure its passage, and other policy makers, builds coalitions, develops and empowers individuals and other organizations to engage in the political process. www.eqca.org

Published by&; Published by xFruits

: http://gay_blog.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-filing-in…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Leave a Reply




Gay Blogads

website stats