Enter your email address to receive our daily LGBT news roundup

You're free to unsubscribe at any time.

Video: US House Democrat: ‘Who cares’ what Michele Bachmann thinks about DOMA?

Post your comment

Comments on this article are now closed.

Reader comments

  1. Angentprovokatur 27 Jun 2013, 5:49pm

    A slightly better response would have been “I can’t imagine why anyone would care, let alone why you are wasting breath and time asking that question.”

    1. David Waite 27 Jun 2013, 7:24pm

      She said all that with “who cares?” She neatly dissed both Bachmann and a reporter who was being stupid with the same eviscerating two-words-and-a-shrug. Spelling it out as you did would have been a more than slightly worse response.

  2. “Bachman is not seeking re-election.”

    Maybe there is a god after all.

    And the supreme court have not reached the level of god. They couldn’t stoop that low.

  3. Robert in S. Kensington 27 Jun 2013, 6:35pm

    Civil marriage is a creation by the hand of god? She’s even more delusional than I thought. Last time I checked, it was created by the secular state to allow hetero adulterers, some of them serial adulterers and religious loons among others of no religious affiliation to marry.

  4. Tom (Winnipeg) 27 Jun 2013, 7:15pm

    I wonder if Michelle Bachman, Perkins, the Popes, etc., etc. will now begin to do some soul-searching–assuming that they do have a soul, because they act very much like they don’t–since their god has turned his head the other way and opted to address the concerns of all who promote rights and freedoms, after considering how much time they have ranted and prayed to blast the gay life. Their god, after all, remains unresponsive; this might be the most effective way to answer these religious, ignorant bigots.

    1. Mihangel apYrs 28 Jun 2013, 7:04am

      don’t hold your breathe!

  5. “A yawn is more disconcerting than a contradiction.” Mason Cooley

    N.P.’s reaction is the right one. A bored dismissal.

  6. A perfect response and a damming indictment of Bachmann and her kind.

  7. Again this God. Who is this guy ? It means nothing to me.

  8. Bachmann’s comment demonstrates how delusional she is, and how unfit to serve in the Congress.

    Oh, and her decision not to run for re-election has nothing to do with an ethics investigation for misuse of campaign funds, nor the fact that she barely won re-election against an opponent with no name recognition. Nope, nothing at all.

These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous, please contact us.

Top commenters this week

Latest stories

See all