Comment: Why ‘straight’ Bob Filner will be better for San Diego than ‘gay’ Carl DeMaio

× Close window

Reader Comments

  1. twitless  14 Nov 2012, 11:07am  Report
    Thumb up 5Thumb down

    Sophisticated electorate.

    Post a reply →
  2. Robert in S. Kensington  14 Nov 2012, 12:14pm  Report
    Thumb up 9Thumb down

    As an extremist Tea Partyer, he would have to be opposed to equal marriage and women’s reproductive rights. To this date, he has NEVER expressed his personal views, for obvious reasons prior to the election. He richly deserved to be defeated.

    There’s a message in this to all extremist conservatives. Oppose equality and you face defeat in the long run, no matter if you’re gay or straight. The electorate will make sure you never hold public office again. Take note, back-benchers.

    Post a reply →
  3. This is how he was received during a parade on July 21st.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tKrA0zBrifI

    Post a reply →
    1. Hilariously humiliating. Who were all those morons walking with him in the Tshirts. More self-loathing Republicans. Soooo funny.

      Post a reply →
  4. Tom Cotner  14 Nov 2012, 3:16pm  Report
    Thumb up 2Thumb down

    Gay people, as a rule, are not stupid. They know that voting for any republican is a vote against their rights, whether that republican is gay or not.
    Nationwide, the candidates who supported gay rights causes won out over bigoted republicans who did not. It is a small victory for us, but a significant one, and one which should be not taken lightly by those who would hold us down as 2nd class citizens.

    Post a reply →
    1. de Villiers  14 Nov 2012, 3:58pm  Report
      Thumb up 0Thumb down

      I’m not sure that there is a rule as to whether gay people are or are not stupid. To suggest that gay people, as a rule, are not stupid suggests that they are superior to straight people.

      Post a reply →
      1. darkmoonman  14 Nov 2012, 4:20pm  Report
        Thumb up 0Thumb down

        Nope, just means we’re generally better informed, awake, and aware. From what I saw of those voting for Romney, this is true.

        Post a reply →
  5. darkmoonman  14 Nov 2012, 4:19pm  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    Gay Rethuglican? No, thank you.

    Post a reply →
  6. Malcom  14 Nov 2012, 4:41pm  Report
    Thumb up -1Thumb down

    Gay Republicans are fake gay people who are really anti-gay Christians who pretend to be gay so they can get votes and if they get the job they screw gays. They make things confusing because they know they can. It is an old psychological trick used by scum like the CIA to confuse people and take advantage of people they want to use. NOM is doing things like this by putting fake gay Christians into the gay community so they can spy on and disrupt the gay community so they can stop gay marriage and “the gay agenday” or LGBT people. Simple put when a person is confused they can be taken advantage of. Evil people know how to confuse people to destroy them mentally. They call it psychological warfare and they are doing it today.

    Post a reply →
    1. This is paranoid and silly. There really are right-wing lgbt people. Sad but true.

      Post a reply →
  7. Craig Nelson  14 Nov 2012, 7:53pm  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    He was clearly trying to milk the gay vote in San Diego to get elected in spite of his party, his policies and supporters.

    The Republicans are clearly very hostile to lgbt people generally but occasionally brook a conservative gay candidate as a cynical manouvre.

    Post a reply →
  8. Carl DeMaio – the very embodiment of the term ‘self-loathing’.

    Post a reply →
  9. Sundancer  15 Nov 2012, 12:40am  Report
    Thumb up -2Thumb down

    Someone needs to have their “gay card” revoked.

    Post a reply →
  10. GingerlyColors  16 Nov 2012, 7:11am  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    And I thought that gay Tea Party Republicans were as rare as hens’ teeth!

    Post a reply →
  11. Maja Verde  27 Nov 2012, 10:14am  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    At some point you’ve got to consider class, as in socio-economic, in this particular battle.

    He is a rich boy wannabe with all the trappings of fiscal conservatism.

    He put his wallet before his zipper. But this only covers up glaring inadequacies. Money is a poor substitute for love, generosity of heart, and community building.

    Log Cabin Republicans are rich, or wannabe rich, white guys who bemoan the loss of white male prestige.

    They will spend a lot of their ill gotten gains, or desires for such, on the shrink’s couch sorting out their diametrically-opposed alliances.

    And for what?
    Money.

    Exactly.

    Post a reply →

Add your comment

These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews.co.uk. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous please click "Report" or email us. Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy




Top users this week

  • Robert in S. Kensington 644
  • GulliverUK 308
  • Eddy 306
  • Jock S. Trap 289
  • Iris 287
  • Rehan 285
  • Mark Y 254
  • rapture 243
  • That There Other David 239
  • Wingby 239