UK: Cardinal Keith O’Brien named Stonewall’s ‘Bigot of the Year’

× Close window

Reader Comments

  1. That Matt  2 Nov 2012, 12:31am  Report
    Thumb up 42Thumb down

    Congratulations to the well-deserved winner. The award will blend in nicely with that remarkably silly hat.

    Post a reply →
    1. Pavlos  2 Nov 2012, 9:39am  Report
      Thumb up 14Thumb down

      Why is Keith O’Brien dressed in a nurses uniform?

      Post a reply →
    2. As they (surely) say, if the mitre fits …

      Post a reply →
  2. jamesh  2 Nov 2012, 12:40am  Report
    Thumb up 27Thumb down

    Couldn’t have gone to a more deserving candidate!

    Post a reply →
  3. Mr Stuie  2 Nov 2012, 12:42am  Report
    Thumb up 24Thumb down

    I’m glad this went ahead, even with the banks threatening to pull out.
    And even if it ultimately means nothing, at least it’s something Cardinal Richelieu can add to his CV.

    Post a reply →
  4. Beberts  2 Nov 2012, 1:37am  Report
    Thumb up -12Thumb down

    There should also be a parallel honorary title to be awarded to the person who most enabled the bigot of the year, and that one should go to citizen Clegg.

    Post a reply →
  5. PinkPolitico  2 Nov 2012, 4:48am  Report
    Thumb up 21Thumb down

    A well deserved award for a demagogue whose opposition to marriage equality and LGBT rights generally goes far beyond normal, acceptable discourse. He has spoken about gay people and relationships in extremely offensive terms which absolutely qualify as bigotry. And shame on the likes of Barclays Bank for threatening to pull out of the awards ceremony, which indicates that their support for LGBT equality is less than genuine. And quite frankly, as a community, we can do without ‘support’ from corporate entities who are willing to side with a fringe, homophobic hate group like ‘Christian Voice’. I intend to convey my views directly to Barclays and I would encourage others to do so as well.

    Post a reply →
  6. something strange about bloke who want to walk around dressed around in so much regalia and funny hats.

    Stop worrying about same sex couples dear worry more about the abuse in teh church

    Post a reply →
  7. I agree with one reservation, that technically I think Simon Lokodo is a rather more dangerous and influential bigot.
    The reason I go along with Keith O’Brien as winner is there’s two kinds of bigots, those who’ll never admit to themselves they’re any kind of bigot and those who wear their bigotry as a badge of honour.
    Lokodo is more likely to see being named and shamed by a gay rights charity as some kind of political endorsement, where the Cardinal will still be convincing himself he’s “defending the sanctity of marriage” or that he “hates the sin and loves the sinner”.

    Post a reply →
  8. D.McCabe  2 Nov 2012, 8:15am  Report
    Thumb up 7Thumb down

    He will proudly put his award on his mantle for all to see!

    Shame the award could not have been split between several of the others who were nominated.

    Post a reply →
  9. Midnighter  2 Nov 2012, 8:39am  Report
    Thumb up 12Thumb down

    I read elsewhere that a mouthpiece paid for by the Catholic Church accused Stonewall (predictably) of ‘intolerance’.

    Their lack of reasoning shouldn’t surprise us, but I would love to hear someone explain to them in a public forum that “intolerance OF intolerance” is actually “pro-tolerance”.

    This hate-monger is a disgrace to the Christian religion.

    Post a reply →
    1. Pavlos  2 Nov 2012, 9:43am  Report
      Thumb up 2Thumb down

      Yes, it’s simple maths that two negatives make a positive.

      Post a reply →
      1. two negatives make a positive: (-3) × (-2) = 6

        Post a reply →
    2. barriejohn  2 Nov 2012, 11:51am  Report
      Thumb up 5Thumb down

      This has now become de rigeur for the bigots. Someone thought that it would be a brilliant idea to accuse those who were simply standing up for their rights of being “bullies” and “intolerant” and it caught on limmediately. They just say it automatically now, without thinking about how ludicrous the idea is. And when you see them campaigning for “freedom” and “human rights” you just know that that’s the opposite of what they mean!

      Post a reply →
  10. barriejohn  2 Nov 2012, 9:01am  Report
    Thumb up 5Thumb down

    I wonder whether he banks at Barclays?

    Post a reply →
    1. Kintay  2 Nov 2012, 9:23am  Report
      Thumb up 8Thumb down

      Barclays the bank run by crooks has no moral high ground to stand on in fact it has no ground at all. A well earned award by the god delusionist.

      Post a reply →
    2. Pavlos  2 Nov 2012, 9:45am  Report
      Thumb up 7Thumb down

      As he’s supposed to be celibate he probably just has a sly barclays every now and then when he thinks God’s not watching.

      Post a reply →
      1. Dave North  2 Nov 2012, 8:35pm  Report
        Thumb up 1Thumb down

        Given his celibacy and the needs of natural testicular requirements, he must therefore be a terminal W@nk3r

        Post a reply →
  11. PeterinSydney  2 Nov 2012, 9:06am  Report
    Thumb up 7Thumb down

    I could not think of a more worthy winner than perhaps Bene XVI

    Post a reply →
  12. PeterinSydney  2 Nov 2012, 9:08am  Report
    Thumb up 6Thumb down

    A most worthy winner, only to be challenged by Benedict XVI himself.

    Post a reply →
  13. Lesley Stafford  2 Nov 2012, 9:09am  Report
    Thumb up 7Thumb down

    Congratulations to Keith O’Brien. A well deserved winner. Let’s give him the CLAP he so richly deserves.

    Post a reply →
  14. I expect the gobshyte will be in contention again next year.

    Post a reply →
    1. Pavlos  2 Nov 2012, 9:50am  Report
      Thumb up 5Thumb down

      Love it! Cardinal Keith Gobshyte O’Brien.

      Post a reply →
  15. aaron  2 Nov 2012, 9:19am  Report
    Thumb up 11Thumb down

    Why are Barclay’s complaining this year and not last year or the year before?

    A problem that should be addressed, in my opinion, is that homophobia isn’t fully defined socially.

    Why are others allowed to distinguish homophobia from racism or anti-semitism? If Cardinal Keith said that black people shouldnt be allowed to marry then there would be uproar, yet it is ok to say that gays shouldn’t marry because it is an opinion “im not homophobic but gays shouldn’t marry” is, to me, the same as “I’m not racist, but black people should not be allowed to marry”.

    Both are EQUALLY wrong.

    Post a reply →
    1. Agreed. It’s double standards. And Barclays were subject to an email campiagn from ‘christians’ to not sponsor Stonewall and this award. They shouldn’t have given in, but no doubt the mention of religion swayed them. I’m sick of people tiptoeing around religious homophobic views. If something’s wrong it’s wrong. To use your very valid point: we don’t complain about a racist comment, then go “Oh, my mistake – you think that because of your religious belief. Fair enough then.” Religious belief doesn’t give you carte blanche to discriminate and denigrate people.

      Post a reply →
  16. Keith O’Brien is a disgusting pig.

    You’d think he’d focus on trying to repar the damage to the lives of the children his clergy have raped over generations, insteag of continuing his policy of disgusting neo-fascism.

    Post a reply →
    1. Pavlos  2 Nov 2012, 9:48am  Report
      Thumb up 5Thumb down

      dAVID, you are being unkind to pigs, what harm did a pig ever do to you?

      Post a reply →
      1. I got food-poisoning from a bacon sarnie once.

        Post a reply →
        1. Then call Keith O’Brien a disgusting bacterium why don”t you? It’s bacteria that cause food poisoning.

          Post a reply →
          1. A most appropriate epithet indeed.

  17. Gays should shut up and let Church leaders trample all over them.

    Post a reply →
  18. And if we needed a reminder of just how closed minded some of them are, take a look at this from the catholic thought police…

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/01/us-university-sovietisation-catholic

    Post a reply →
    1. That There Other David  2 Nov 2012, 11:20am  Report
      Thumb up 5Thumb down

      And that is exactly why UK Catholics need to stop kowtowing to these Cardinals and Bishops who just parrot the Vatican’s policies. Ratzinger is acting as if Rome still rules the world, and nobody within his own group of followers is seriously taking him on about it. In this day and age, when humans are more connected than ever before it’s about time Catholics told their so-called leaders that enough is enough. His views on this subject are not Christian, they aren’t moral, and they most certainly are not acceptable.

      Post a reply →
      1. The Vatican is a totalitarian dictatorship, dissent is not tolerated.

        Post a reply →
        1. That There Other David  2 Nov 2012, 8:10pm  Report
          Thumb up 1Thumb down

          Exactly why so many are becoming ex-Catholics.

          Post a reply →
          1. Dave North  2 Nov 2012, 8:39pm  Report
            Thumb up 3Thumb down

            My “Civil Partner” is now ex-catholic. Unfortunately the childhood indoctrination ( Programming ) still exists to a point.

            Belief in afterlife, hell etc…….

            My Brother in law is also, after he found out the Priest that married him and my sister went down for child rape.

            Isn’t religion lovely…….. NOT.

  19. Robert in S. Kensington  2 Nov 2012, 11:31am  Report
    Thumb up 2Thumb down

    I would have thought Colin Hart of C4M should have been given an award as well as Lord Carey, Anne Widdecombe, Nadine Dorries and Anna Minichiello for starters, as well as the editors of the Daily Mail and Telegraph. So richly deserved.

    Post a reply →
    1. Yes, maybe they could have another battery of lesser awards for characters who have proven themselves to be perennial bigots.

      Post a reply →
      1. Robert in S. Kensington  2 Nov 2012, 11:54am  Report
        Thumb up 2Thumb down

        Edward Leigh being the latest!

        Post a reply →
        1. Pavlos  2 Nov 2012, 1:03pm  Report
          Thumb up 1Thumb down

          A deeply disgusting man.

          Post a reply →
    2. Dave North  2 Nov 2012, 12:47pm  Report
      Thumb up 3Thumb down

      You forgot Christine Odone of the terrorgraph.

      Post a reply →
      1. Pavlos  2 Nov 2012, 1:04pm  Report
        Thumb up 2Thumb down

        She’s just bonkers and totally irrational, her powers of comprehension seem to be cross-wired.

        Post a reply →
  20. Robert in S. Kensington  2 Nov 2012, 11:51am  Report
    Thumb up 6Thumb down

    So by her definition, the term “racist” shouldn’t be applied to those who don’t like ethnic minorities and want to deny them rights because of it? Islamc terrorists shouldn’t be called terrorists then just because their religious beliefs differ from the west?

    I’m sick of these apologists for religious nutters. It’s one thing to oppose homosexuality but quite another when people resort to the most vile, disgusting comments and insinuations targeting our lives and fomenting homophobia in the process. Words have consequences. If idiots like O’Brien don’t want to be called bigot, then stop being one, keep your mouth shut. If you can’t say something nice, say nothing. Being bigoted is a choice, learned behaviour. Clearly people like him never really understood the teachings of Jesus Christ. O’Brien and his ilk may call themselves “Christians”, but merely in name only, certainly not by their deeds or words.

    Post a reply →
    1. Beberts  2 Nov 2012, 6:22pm  Report
      Thumb up -1Thumb down

      Nick Clegg and his Bigotgate should ring all bells for the whole gay community. That’s the message coming from top to down, and she is a conservative. What do you expect from her when even the “gay friendly” LibDems are working against us?

      Post a reply →
  21. Cardinal Capone  2 Nov 2012, 12:05pm  Report
    Thumb up 2Thumb down

    Many expect a priest to be able to set an example of love and compassion.

    When a “man of the cloth” says things in a hateful and prejudiced way it is shocking to many.

    This award is feedback to the Cardinal that that is how he has come across, and it may lead to some self-examination on his part.

    If it does, that can only be a good thing.

    Post a reply →
  22. Another Hannah  2 Nov 2012, 12:47pm  Report
    Thumb up 1Thumb down

    Stonewall’s bigot of the year, or Barclay’s and Coutes nothing wrong at all award of the year. Shows clearly the danger of allowing corporate sponsorship. If the money is tied to dictating what you do and don’t do then it isn’t sponsorship, it’s a heterosexual corporate takeover!

    Post a reply →
  23. Attanasio66  2 Nov 2012, 12:58pm  Report
    Thumb up 3Thumb down

    Finally some good PR for the Vatican: Catholicism is an Award-winning religion! Cardinal O’Brien must be very proud…

    Post a reply →
  24. I am delighted. But I hope that Stonewall has taken steps to advise O’Brien of his award. I know from personal experience that individuals like O’Brien are cocooned in a world of religious ritual with flattering lackeys on all sides. Stonewall needs to ensure that news of the award needs to get through to him.

    Post a reply →
  25. Pavlos  2 Nov 2012, 1:52pm  Report
    Thumb up 3Thumb down

    Maybe Stonewall could consider changing the name of the award to “Anti-gay Bully of the Year”

    Post a reply →
    1. That There Other David  2 Nov 2012, 8:14pm  Report
      Thumb up 4Thumb down

      How about “Nastiest paedophile-enabling confidence trickster of the year”?

      Mind you, we don’t want it completely limited to Cardinals and Bishops do we?

      Post a reply →
      1. Pavlos  2 Nov 2012, 8:51pm  Report
        Thumb up 1Thumb down

        Yes, that would limit the candidates rather distinctly.

        Post a reply →
        1. Also, could be classed as discriminatory, as you are excluding other possible candidates!

          Post a reply →
  26. Congrats mate… Wear your ‘B-O-T-Y’ badge with pride; next to the cross perhaps…. ?

    As to the banks threatening to pull funding… more bark than bite, they’ll only add it to their champagne fund.

    Post a reply →
  27. Simon Phillips  3 Nov 2012, 1:52am  Report
    Thumb up -7Thumb down

    Notice my comment has been deleted surprise surprise. You just can’t take criticism. You’re not just hypocrites but cowards as well. O Sorry am I being a bigot!!!

    Post a reply →
    1. That There Other David  3 Nov 2012, 9:23am  Report
      Thumb up 4Thumb down

      The comments section sometimes blackholes posts for no apparent reason. It does it to everyone at some time or other.

      So why not post your point again instead of just mithering?

      Post a reply →
    2. If you use certain unacceptable words then your comment won’t post, I didn’t see your lost comment but suggest you rephrase it and try again.

      Post a reply →
  28. The Halcyon  4 Apr 2013, 5:07pm  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    Do we get to nominate him for “Hypocrite of the Year” this year?

    Post a reply →

Add your comment

These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews.co.uk. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous please click "Report" or email us. Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy




Top users this week

  • Robert in S. Kensington 856
  • Eddy 378
  • Jock S. Trap 292
  • bobbleobble 260
  • D.McCabe 243
  • Rehan 217
  • Ray123 188
  • rapture 187
  • Midnighter 177
  • SteveC 172