People trying to say that religious beliefs have a place in the legal system again. How tiresome. The majority to not have sway over the rights of the minority.
I wonder what the bigots’ next line of attack will be.
seems to be a common theme in the US, if a group has the name family or freedom in their name its very likely they stand for the exact opposite of that
“Rogue legislators” = democratically elected representatives whose views I don’t agree with.
This group’s idea of “Constitutional Freedoms” clearly doesn’t include representative democracy. Perhaps they should try a country with different “constitutional freedoms” – Iran, maybe, or North Korea.
These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews.co.uk. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous please click "Report" or email us. Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy
People trying to say that religious beliefs have a place in the legal system again. How tiresome. The majority to not have sway over the rights of the minority.
I wonder what the bigots’ next line of attack will be.
How can a group that is trying to stop people marrying call themselves “New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms”. Are they taking the piss?
Bit of an oxymoron isn’t it?
seems to be a common theme in the US, if a group has the name family or freedom in their name its very likely they stand for the exact opposite of that
For once, a court has done the right thing.
“for once…..”? really? I think you will find that (especially senior) judges are way more liberal than you give them credit for.
“Rogue legislators” = democratically elected representatives whose views I don’t agree with.
This group’s idea of “Constitutional Freedoms” clearly doesn’t include representative democracy. Perhaps they should try a country with different “constitutional freedoms” – Iran, maybe, or North Korea.
Something tells me they would be happy with Iran and it’s religious intolerance.