Reader comments · Hertfordshire: Council branded ‘rotten’ over HIV charity decision · PinkNews

Enter your email address to receive our daily LGBT news roundup

You're free to unsubscribe at any time.


Hertfordshire: Council branded ‘rotten’ over HIV charity decision

Post your comment

Comments on this article are now closed.

Reader comments

  1. Igor Norant 21 Sep 2012, 4:41pm

    Would this be the same level of service to The LGBT community as the withdrawal of funding in Bedfordshire for HIV outreach work. It seems that youner people, as portrayed by The Health Authority, are not the only ones who have become complacent on the issue

  2. GingerlyColors 22 Sep 2012, 6:25am

    Will Cresent still get funding if it had a star with it?

  3. David Gervais 25 Sep 2012, 2:13am

    Depending on the relationship between the two ASOs, how about Herts Aid opening a West side office by contracting out to Crescent?
    In addition to providing service where it is needed, this would help with future funding decisions by increasing the number of clients served and lowering Herts Aid’s average overhead.

    I know nothing about the local politics, however, it now occurs to me: Is this some party’s agenda?

    1. Hi David,

      That would be a sensible thing to do, as for the last almost 25 years we had worked alongside them. The whole issue seems to be rather political, the decision doesnt make sense at all if viewed on the basis of cost, or accessibility so what is left?

      It would be simpler for the County Council to return to the previous arrangement, and split funding between the two organisations as before. The issue there i see is that we at the Crescent could afford to run on the reduced funding, however i think the other organisation may struggle as their overheads are considerably higher than ours it seems.

      Iain Murtagh

      1. caped crusaider 25 Sep 2012, 3:45pm

        First london aids charity ukc appears in private eye finally revealing the 2005 hero awards lost £150,000 now this in private eye its being kept very quiet the cost of closing down london aids charity ukc was £90,000 more money wasted in the aids charity sector all hushed up along with what happened to the £75,000 ukc rescue package announced but never heard ofagain ????

        1. caped crusaider 25 Sep 2012, 4:40pm

          What about the clients of nankrupt lonfpn aids charity ukc whose slogo was we care do u ? Abandoned in their collapse and not allowed a voice ? ? ?

          1. caped crusaider 25 Sep 2012, 5:01pm

            What about tht destroying crudaids compromise agreement with a police panel member recently they were paid off with charity money by the rich gay tory boys to destroy documents oh la la

  4. caped crusaider 25 Sep 2012, 5:09pm

    What about the police panel member emailed a london aids charitys client database who had the met police kindly excercising the discretion in not arresting them all hushed upand denied a voice by the hiv media oh la la not more cover ups

  5. caped crusaider 25 Sep 2012, 5:12pm

    What about the police panel member who offered their resignation to the chief inspector of the met after complaining being sent the multiple medical data of another panel member by crusaud all bushed up by by the hiv media more cover ups oh la la

  6. caped crusaider 25 Sep 2012, 5:16pm

    What about the chairman of bankrupt aids charity ukc writing to the met police for support for a police panel member who abandoned their panel sitting with the charity commission writing to crusaid instructing them to cease all contact ALl HUshed up by hiv media oh la la

    1. caped crusaider 25 Sep 2012, 6:05pm

      Ukc aids charity hushed up crusaid trustees threatened a police panel member with injunctive proceedings at the high court without hesitation – then quickly emailed it was long closed and marvellous if they attended all their events !..!.?.

      1. caped crusaider 25 Sep 2012, 6:15pm

        The hiv media and gay press have hushed up a police panel member had crusaids staff copying them into their termination of contract emails to crusaid and helped them regain their benfits ukc and the charity funded mag positive nation denief people living with hiv a voice with the ceo stephen bitti claiming errors of judgement in the final poditive nation mag the charity published staff went onto claim in a letter published in plusve hiv mag ukc management were awarded £10-15,000 payrises after losing £150,000 on the 2005 hero awards something that was not dislosed in the charity ukcs returns to the charity commission but only came out when private eye mag publishef the truth a few yeard later – oh la la

        1. caped crusaider 25 Sep 2012, 6:26pm

          The met police kindly excercised their discretion in not arresting a police panel member after london aids charity ukc due to a “regrettable error”- ukc trustees accidently emailed them their clienf data base of gaymeniving london with biv/aids all hushed up along with them being sent the multiple medical data by crusaid of a police panel member they were sitting opposite !!! The police inztructed them to contact the ICO and the data was all destroyed securely -the hiv media has trief to cover this up for years from the very people they claim to serve – oh la la

          1. caped crusaider 25 Sep 2012, 6:50pm

            The ceo of The NAT has written to the seriously distressed ex police panel member regarding their concerns after being disclosex the police emails but the gay press and hiv media have refused to comment so far many years later ? Why while the london hiv charity sector is claiming its “transparent upfront and honest” – the new publisher of positive nation hiv mag announced “its jobs for the boys and dishonesty” and they are going to start exposing organisations…but they never did as the hiv charity gravy train chuggs on – oh la la

    2. I literally cannot read anything you wrote. What do you have against proper punctuation?

These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous, please contact us.