Reader comments · Lady Gaga builds nursery for godson and angers animal rights organisation · PinkNews

Enter your email address to receive our daily LGBT news roundup

You're free to unsubscribe at any time.


Lady Gaga builds nursery for godson and angers animal rights organisation

Post your comment

Comments on this article are now closed.

Reader comments

  1. It’s the middle of summer – why would Gaga wear a real fur for any reason other than to announce that she is a disgusting person, who supports the slaughter of animals so she can make some revolting fashion statement?

    1. dAVID, Hermes’ Autumn range has that exact coat, which is made from high pile fur, a synthetic. Have you checked out the designer? Are you even aware of PETA and what kind of people run and work for them? PETA are well known for funding groups like the Animal Liberation Front, who are known by some governments (including the US) to be domestic terrorists. They have been involved in armed robberies, arson and home invasions of scientists they believe (often wrongly) are experimenting on animals. And you call Lady GaGa disgusting? dAVID, you are illinformed on these matters and it appears you relish on every opportunity when Lady GaGa is trying to be potrayed in a “bad light” in the meda.

      1. Hermes does not make fake fur.

        She is wearing a garment made from hides of animals who were skinned alive for their fur.

        In 28 degree heat.

        This has NOTHING to do with PETA. This is to do with a woman choosing to be a disgusting human being.

        Lady Gaga is a truly disgusting human being.

  2. Jonelle Atkinson 14 Aug 2012, 7:02pm

    If this is true and she was wearing real fur, then I’m very dissapointed with Lady G – I’m going to see her European Tour in Manchester in Sept and expect a response from her about ‘fur’ that is both humane and responsible, otherwise there’ll be a ticket for sale…

    1. She already did give a response. She told all the critics to make sure that they credit the designer. lmao. I love her more now.

    2. Hermes’ Autumn range has that exact coat, which is made from high pile fur, a synthetic. Have you checked out the designer?

      1. Don’t lie Darren – that’s a coat made from the hides of skinned alive animals and you know it.

  3. David Wainwright 14 Aug 2012, 8:08pm

    Flavour of the month for Sir Elton and his partner film maker David Furniture , presumably a few years down the road they will be slagging her off as they are want to do with their PREVIOUS so called friends who fell from favour .

    1. The troubleis that she is their son’s godmother.

      Nevertheless they will dump her as soon as she falls out of fashion with the public (because that’s what Elton and Hispartnerdavidfurnish do – remember they were all over Miss Dynamite like a rash when she was popular only to dump her as soon as her career ended).

      It’s an incredibly STUPID move on Gaga’s part.

      Many people think fur is cruel, monstrous and disgusting and people who wear it are teh same.

  4. Isn’t it time these out of touch fools started to consider their carbon foot-step on the planet ?

  5. Paddyswurds 15 Aug 2012, 12:11am

    Another vile fame ho who has no talent and must resort to Vaudvillian shock tactics to sell her CDs consisting of mostly covers of other peoples not so great music….What has happened to the music industry that it doesn’t attract talented women any more. where are the Barbra Streisands and the Joan Baez of the 21st century. Adele is an exception , a very talented woman but who now has decided that she has more important priorities as a woman, being a full time nurturing mother. We will miss her music if that what she decides.
    This talentless freak show, GAGA, has yet to show any such virtues either as a woman or an artist.

  6. Paddyswurds 15 Aug 2012, 12:14am

    ….and, I meant to add if it is true that she has prostituted herself to the vile fur industry, she must be made to feel the full wrath of those who oppose such barbarity in the name of fashion.

  7. It really annoys me at how bad an image Lady gaga puts out for the gay community. I fear that people will think bad of us because of the weird crazy things Lady gaga does and presume that we are the same, because lady gaga has a large gay fanbase.
    ( Its not her motives or what she is trying to say i oppose its how she express it and the way she buys real animal fur!!)

    But i really dont like her new song it is very offensive and completly wrong.

    1. the song is about princess diana and the words to it are not respectful or nice at all.

    2. Lady Gaga does not represent the gay community.

      She represents an industry that skins animals for their hides, so that ugly women can look even uglier.

  8. Spanner1960 15 Aug 2012, 10:16am

    Well, a) it may be fake fur, or b) it could be an old coat, or a coat made from old fur.
    There is still a big demand for antique furs – the animal died years ago, so what’s the harm?

    1. Paddyswurds 15 Aug 2012, 3:02pm

      It is promoting the use of animal skins for fashion, albeit a thousand years or one day it is always very very wrong. She should be thoroughly ashamed of herself, firstly as a human being (she is one?) and secondly as a woman.

  9. How is this TABLOID piece of information relevant at all ???
    This is not news.
    I am very disappointed.
    What next? Some celeb breaks a nail?
    Celebrities worshipping is not healthy, and should certainly not be part of any news coverage if you want to be taken seriously.
    But then again our community is very shallow and you just play the numbers game, Shame on you PINK NEWS

    1. Pink News seems to be obsessed with reporting on that elderly wh0re Elton John.

      Elton John is a despicable pig for repeatedly whoring himself out for money – whether it’s to be the wedding singer for homophobic extremists like Rush Limbaugh; or for performing loads of concerts in South Africa during the apartheid era.

      1. dAVID, are you aware that Queen/Freddie Mercury also performed concerts in South Africa during the apartheid era? So stop trying to make out Elton John was the only musician to do this. Here is the exact information for you:

        “Queen were widely criticised when they broke a United Nations cultural boycott in 1984 by performing a series of shows at Sun City, an entertainment complex in Bophuthatswana, a homeland of (then) apartheid South Africa. As a result of these shows, Queen was placed on a United Nations list of artists who broke the boycott and was widely criticised in magazines such as the NME.”

        1. Freddie Mercury is DEAD and has been for 22 years (or has that slipped your mind?)

          Elton John has never apologised or explained his decision to profit from the proceeds of racism, so he deserves to be condemned loudly.

          He is a disgusting wh0re – a man without principle when it comes to money.

  10. A few members on this website are so ill-informed and ignorant, it is shocking. I truly wish people would research items before commenting on them. Especially when it comes to Lady GaGa.

    1. Is she wearing the hide of a dead animal or not?

      1. The fur she is wearing is FAKE.

        To quote GaGa herself:

        “For those press and such who are writing about whether or not my fur is actually real, please don’t forget to credit the designer HERMES. Thank You! LOVE, gaga.”

        1. How do you know it’s fake?

          Hermes makes coats from the hides of dead animals and nowhere does Lady Gaga confirm that her coat is fake.

          If it was fake she could easily confirm that.

          Her refusal to do do indicates that she is wearing a coat made from the hides of animals, trapped and skinned for their coats.

          In the height of summer.

          The disgusting pig.

          1. You are wrong, my friend. The reason GaGa has not come out and publicly announced that the coat is indeed fake, is so fools like you can come out, make outrageous accusations against her person for “endorsing” genuine fur clothing – but then she can make her move and make you all look the idiots you are.

            You truly are a GaGa-hating troll, aren’t you? Even if GaGa donated $1,000,000,000.00 to various worthy causes throughout the world, you dAVID, would still find fault. You read what you want to read and do not deal in facts. How unfortunate for you. You’re more to be pitied than scolded.

          2. You are an idiot Darren.

            Are you a christian?

            You choose to believe that she is not an animal hating monster to suit your own purposes. Despite the COMPLETE lack of evidence to back up your lunacy.

            She is a cruel and disgusting person for choosing to wear the hides of trapped animals.

  11. Confusing article! I thought it was about building a room over the Aegean sea but see that it’s about a fur coat.
    Who in their right mind wears fur or would even entertain the notion of it? Surely it’s synthetic? I do hope so.

    1. It’s real.

      Some of her more insane and unstable fans (see Darren above) are pretending it’s fake even though you can google ‘Hermes fur coats’ and find the blood-garment that Gaga chooses to wear.

      Poisonous, horrible, disgusting, cruel human being.

      And it’s an UGLY coat. Just like Gaga.

      1. I don’t understand what you’re talking about? Are you trying to justify to me the fact that you’re an idiot?

        YOU are calling ME insane and unstable? Sweetie, you’re the one who bothers himself with everything Lady GaGa says or does. Do you go to bed at night thinking about how you can berate Lady GaGa more? You are unhinged. Seek psychiatric help. Immediately.

        P.S the fur is fake – get over it. You making comment after comment about how it’s supposedly real will not make it real.

        1. But it is real.

          Hermes makes REAL fur coats.

          Real means not fake. Can you understand that?

          Stop being a delusional little fanboy.

          Your idol is wearing a coat from the hides of animals which were skinned alive so she could make some twisted, sick fashion statement.

  12. Mister Fister 15 Aug 2012, 2:38pm

    Why all the outrage about wearing fur? Leather and suede are the result of killing animals too. The only skin you should wear is your own. Go vegan!

    1. The difference between leather and suede is that the animals from which those are taken are also eaten, so it is using the remains of the body.

      I’m not a fan of leather or meat but realise that is not as purely revolting as fur is.

      Mink and fur involve breeding animals with the sole intention of skinning them alive to make ugly coats for disgusting human beings.

      Lady Gaga should be ashamed of herself.

      1. Mister Fister 15 Aug 2012, 8:21pm

        Point taken dAVID.

  13. Lady gaga, Elton John and David Soft-Furnishings. Can you imagine three more tedious Cretans to be around? That poor kid. He has to sit there listening to thm bitch about Madonna whilst sticking their heads up each others arses.

These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous, please contact us.