Thomson Reuters says Minnesota gay marriage ban ‘would be bad for business’

× Close window

Reader Comments

  1. in the final analysis, the people who fight the HARDEST against equality rights for LGBT people, are the ones how would be the LEAST affected by those very same rights.

    Post a reply →
  2. Batmanz  16 Jul 2012, 9:04am  Report
    Thumb up -1Thumb down

    So gay marriage comes down to money?

    WTF?

    Post a reply →
  3. Jock S. Trap  16 Jul 2012, 9:09am  Report
    Thumb up 3Thumb down

    Good for Reuters and those companies who see Minnesota as doing the wrong thing.

    Nothing good will come from restricting the LGBT community, if anything it just shows up the real bigots and I believe people are now taking more note of the hateful!!

    Post a reply →
  4. D.McCabe  16 Jul 2012, 9:12am  Report
    Thumb up 2Thumb down

    Good for Reuters and other companies who recognise the importance of full LGBT rights.

    Post a reply →
  5. That’s the way to do it. Once Americans (and not just them) start cottoning on to the fact that homophobic discrimination costs money to big business, the citadels will fall. Good on Thomson Reuters.

    Post a reply →
  6. Unfortunately doing the “right thing” doesn’t sway opinion as much a cold hard cash.

    Congrats to Reuters for taking a stand against bias against LGBT persons!

    Post a reply →

Add your comment

These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews.co.uk. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous please click "Report" or email us. Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy