Enter your email address to receive our daily LGBT news roundup

You're free to unsubscribe at any time.

Video: “Child Celebrities Opposing Kirk Cameron (CCOKC)”

Post your comment

Comments on this article are now closed.

Reader comments

  1. And why on earth do we give any attention to whatever mr Cameron thinks about homosexuality???

    1. Well, he previously ‘proved’ god exists by pointing at a banana
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfucpGCm5hY
      and that evolution is false because there’s no such thing as a crocodile/ duck hybrid.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOn7DInBWK4
      Is there no beginning to his talents?

    2. Kirk is a krazy Kristian Kult leader who wants us to drink the Kool Aid. He is the Christian’s celebrity poster boy for the new generation who spouts what the rest of the insane Christian haters spout, hate and destruction of anybody who is not crazy like them.

  2. This was an awesome video – I am not gay or homosexual but I firmly belive that those who are have every right to live the way they choose to live without being shunned! Good Job For Child Actors/Actresses!

    1. Dont think Kirk was shunning anyone.

      He was simply expressing traditional Christian morality.

      But gay people are now so insecure that any criticism is ‘shunning’ and ‘homophobic’.

      Grow up gays !

      1. What you call “Traditional Christian morality” IS homophobic.
        If Kirk’s going to call it unnatural, he’s going to have to whitewash a whole bunch of same sex attraction between animals that occur in nature out of the picture including dolphins, bonobo chimps, penguins, elephants, flamingos, swans… the list goes on. Mind you he thinks the ultimate test of the truth of evolution is whether a crocoduck exists so science ain’t his strong suit.
        If he’s going to claim we’re detrimental and out to destroy the foundations of civilisation, he’s going to have to do better than a quote from Leviticus and Deutoronomy.
        All the arguments I’ve ever heard on that score have either been circular logic or shoddy slippery slope arguments along the lines of “If everyone was a homosexual the human race would die out”. Well there are more out gay people than ever before and the world population is rising… 7 Billion at the last count.
        So tell me, which part of what Kirk said isn’t homophobic?

      2. He’s expressing a literalist biblical view which is not the same as traditional Christianity. Most mainstream Christians do not share the homophobic views of this fundamentalist evangelical variant of Christianity of which I suspect James is a part.

      3. Traditional christian morality – You mean how it is a guide book for how to treat your slaves? Or how to stone women who are not virgins on their wedding day? Or how to stone disobedient children? Or how to dash the infant children of your enemies on the rocks?

        Those who think that there is “morality” in christianity have clearly never read the bloody bible. All the psycho desert deity does is maim and bloody slaughter.

      4. Staircase2 16 Apr 2012, 5:24pm

        @ Andi
        …utter bollocks..!

  3. Wub Folfsky 15 Apr 2012, 7:23pm

    It’s a nice spoof…. but really, I am not and will never be a stylist – I think it makes out that all homosexuals are into that stuff but that’s not true (I’m an Engineer btw).

    :P

    1. David Waite 15 Apr 2012, 7:41pm

      I would have expected an engineer to be able to see and hear facts better, whatever your orientation. This is a group of former CHILD ACTORS reminding another CHILD ACTOR of their only common experience (while child actors) of interacting with gay people who were known to be gay. They weren’t implying that set carpenters, set electricians, lighting engineers, et cetera were NOT sometimes homosexual. They were pointing out that (when they all worked as child actors) the only UNcloseted persons who they met professionally were hairdressers and make-up artists. They were actually (perhaps too subtly for some to grasp) making YOUR point, alongside their larger one.

      1. Wub Folfsky 15 Apr 2012, 8:58pm

        Oh well, thank you for your keen attention to the video. I do tend to pay less attention to general news than I do to technical news, so if I were you I wouldn’t be too riled about an engineer that isn’t a social affairs expert. I watched the video and took an impression of it, just like anyone watching it will do.

        I see your logic, and your theory seems based on good reason… This Sir, is what we call ‘Peer Review’. I put forward a notion and someone else reviews it….

        Your use of capital letters perhaps suggests frustration, but there’s honestly no need to fret.

        Much Love
        Wub Folfsky
        <3

  4. LondonVicar 15 Apr 2012, 9:02pm

    “Blessed are you when you are persecuted for righteousness sake for yours is the kingdom of heaven”
    – Jesus.

    So well done Kirk.

    1. Wub Folfsky 15 Apr 2012, 9:05pm

      hahahaha, such a troll <3

    2. So ridicule following incoherent, prejudiced babbling is ‘persecution’ now, is it? Bless.

      Where are lions when you need ‘em?

    3. Except he is neither persecuted, nor right. And there is no kingdom of heaven. And Jesus probably didn’t exist.

      But apart from all that, sure, why not?

  5. Fantast Worlds from the big toy shop in the universe
    Well if we go back to Adam & Eve have the God followers forgotten that their so called God told Eve she must not defy him by eating the fruit in the garden
    Well look what happened she tempted Adam with an apple and the all loving God punished her by giving her the blessing of pain each month and during child birth for her sins.
    If she had not had the temptations put in her way by God playing his games, then she would not have been punished by God, Or was that the idea otherwise his game would be boring and end so soon.
    And how was Adam and Eve supposed to learn about making babies, What part of watching animals rutting in the fields and forests did it teach then they had to marry first? And sex before marriage is not allowed so who was going to marry the pair.
    Without being taught what to do or not to do Who was really responsible for Eve being tempted was it the Snake or really God playing games, Was there was any form of churches or registrar offices around in those days, their was no books or internet to log on to in the first few million years of the great creation to show you how and what and what to do first. And when did Ikea arrive in town to show them how to set up home and make ready for babies. How silly do we get with this, we can all write stories to suit how we see the way of the world, the next Ice Age will wipe out heterosexuals and only LGBT shall inherited the earth and we use test tube factory grown babies to keep the generations going, so no more need for marriage and heterosexuals
    Build your own fantasy world But don’t bite on any Red Apples and guys check your trouser snakes or God may change everything we know as the world and who we are !!!!!

  6. Buggery caues AIDS 16 Apr 2012, 9:27am

    @ Flapjack
    “If Kirk’s going to call it unnatural, he’s going to have to whitewash a whole bunch of same sex attraction between animals that occur in nature out of the picture including dolphins, bonobo chimps, penguins, elephants, flamingos, swans… the list goes on”

    My reply.
    You mistakenly think that everything that happens in nature can be defined as natural and therefore cannot be wrong. In neach other and eat each other. You would therefore say humans should be able to do the same.
    Because something happens in nature does that make it natural Paedophilia and child abuse happen in human nature but we realize those humans are actng against nature, just as the animals you mentioned who in reality are not homosexual but hav sex friendships, just like heterosexual humans.
    Some animals occasionally make mistakes and try to mate with the wrong sex which of course is not natures intended way as the genitals are set up for opposite sex mating.

    1. Dr Robin Guthrie 16 Apr 2012, 10:34am

      ROFL

      “You mistakenly think that everything that happens in nature can be defined as natural …..”

      And just what the hell else can natural events in nature be defined as, in your twisted illogical world…..

    2. Natural
      adjective
      1. existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind
      [OED]

      D-. Fail.

      1. Hetero-pride.. Great 2B Straight!. 16 Apr 2012, 12:31pm

        You are both total idiots.You are talking about behaviours in animals. Animals are of course natural but behaviour is a psycological construct yet you seek to link it with the definition for natural, which defines origins.
        Behaviour can be un-natural. Humans are natural but is murder not natural, nor is child abuse or would you argue that because child abuse happens in nature (aongst humans) that it is not wrong or unnatural?

        1. The biggest idiots are those who bring nature into the issue in the first place by claiming homosexuality is ‘unnatural’.

          Looked in a mirror lately, o sage* one?

          *Or perhaps rosemary would be more appropriate.

        2. So you’re comparing being gay with child abuse and murder. Nice!

          Listen –

          We get aroused over people of the same sex.

          We cannot get aroused over people of the opposite sex.

          We cannot help that.

          We cannot change.

          I do not want to change.

          We are just trying to live our lives as well as we can.

          And here’s the important bit: no one else is being harmed by gay people having sex with each other. Go fight a more important battle.

        3. “You are talking about behaviours in animals.”

          And being one yourself, is it implied that you are an expert?

    3. It’s almost as if whether something is “natural” is a complete red herring eh?

      Everything is “natural”. There’s no such thing as “unnatural”. No such thing as “supernatural”. Those are empty, meaningless terms. “Nature” is a synonym for “everything there is”. Trying to call some things “natural” and others “unnatural” is a futile exercise in arbitrary line-drawing, to no fruitful end.

      The APPROPRIATE factor in moral consideration is whether something is HARMFUL. And, what do you know, same-sex love and same-sex sex are completely harmless. Good fun too!

  7. Buggery caues AIDS 16 Apr 2012, 9:30am

    @ Flapjack
    “If Kirk’s going to call it unnatural, he’s going to have to whitewash a whole bunch of same sex attraction between animals that occur in nature out of the picture including dolphins, bonobo chimps, penguins, elephants, flamingos, swans… the list goes on”

    My reply.
    You mistakenly think that everything that happens in nature can be defined as natural and therefore cannot be wrong. In nature, animals eat each other, you would therefore say humans should be able to do the same as it happens in nature!!!
    Because something happens in nature does that make it natural or inate. Paedophilia and child abuse happen in human nature but we realize those humans are actng against nature, just as the animals you mentioned who in reality are not homosexual but have same sex friendships, just like heterosexual humans.
    Some animals occasionally make mistakes and try to mate with the wrong sex which of course is not natures intended way as the genitals are set up for opposite sex mating.

    1. Saying the same drivel twice doesn’t make it any the less drivel, you know.

      1. Hetero-pride.. Great 2B Straight!. 16 Apr 2012, 12:22pm

        Name one falsehood in my post if you can?
        You proceed on a false premise, That everything that happens in nature is as intended or that nimal patterns should apply to humans!

        1. I refer you to the OED definition of ‘natural’. Even you might be able to work it out from there.

      2. Hetero-pride.. Great 2B Straight!. 16 Apr 2012, 12:32pm

        You are both total idiots.You are talking about behaviours in animals. Animals are of course natural but behaviour is a psychological construct yet you seek to link it with the definition for natural, which defines origins.
        Behaviour can be un-natural. Humans are natural but is murder not natural, nor is child abuse or would you argue that because child abuse happens in nature (aongst humans) that it is not wrong or unnatural?.

        1. To repeat (since it clearly hasn’t sunk in yet): saying the same drivel twice doesn’t make it any the less drivel, you know.

        2. Religion is insanity in trolls. 16 Apr 2012, 2:20pm

          You straight? Straight out of the centerfold of closet case monthly more like. Straight ha ha, you? Wanking off dribbling down your chin over gay porn at the dead of night, then trolling gay news sites does not make you straight my love, you are the Queen Cleopatra of Pink News. That’s you honey, Queen of Denial.

          1. While I see your point, that’s more than a little insulting to the memory of Cleopatra…

  8. Religion causes madness in homophobes. 16 Apr 2012, 11:00am

    Kirk Cameron is a moron and religion is organised madness for example.

    The Bible states that Jesus was circumcised eight days after his birth. This became the source of a protracted debate among medieval scholars who couldn’t figure out what became of the foreskin. Did it remain here on Earth? Was it reunited with Christ and ascended with him into Heaven? Or did it ascend into heaven separately, on its own?

    The belief that the “holy prepuce” remained on Earth was probably the most popular position. In fact, no less than 21 medieval churches and abbeys claimed to be in possession of the holy foreskin.

    St. Catherine of Siena reportedly wore the foreskin of Jesus as a ring on her finger.

    Religion it’s just a load of old cock really!

  9. Religion causes insanity in homophobes. 16 Apr 2012, 11:03am

    However, the Austrian nun Agnes Blannbekin (1244-1315) took a different view. She became obsessed by the holy foreskin, dwelling on the loss of blood and pain Christ must have suffered during his circumcision. Such thoughts led her to a revelation. While celebrating the Feast of the Circumcision (traditionally held on January 1), Agnes suddenly “felt the Lord’s foreskin on her tongue, thin as the membrane of an egg, and swallowed it with great sweetness ‘about a hundred times’. Christ then revealed to her that his foreskin had been resurrected with him on Easter.”

    Another theory about the fate of the ‘holy’ foreskin is put forward by the 17th century theologian Leo Allatius. In an essay, De Praeputio Domini Nostri Jesu Christi Diatriba, he speculated “that the ‘holy’ foreskin may have ascended into heaven at the same time as Jesus himself, and might have become the rings of Saturn.”

    Religion is just a load of old cock

    1. Thanks for providing the best laugh of the morning (plus a few eeuw moments)!

    2. So, she blew a hundred priests then? Busy girl.

    3. the holy foreskin ascended to heaven on winged hippo.

  10. Religion is insanity in trolls. 16 Apr 2012, 11:18am

    Kirk Cameron a typical mouthpiece of the christian crazy cult. My all time favourite is Jason Russell sashaying bare assed in broad daylight camping his proverbial t i t s off. The homophobic trolls should take note, it can and just might happen to you too! Wouldn’t it be better to just accept your true self and come out of the closet and have a try and being normal and happy? Religion is the last refuge of the homophobic self hater.

  11. Kirk is a piece of crap bury him.

  12. so he’s an evangelical – the people who in the usa justified slavery as epr teh bible and gave us the kluxers and segregation.

These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews.co.uk. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous, please contact us.

Top commenters this week

Latest stories

See all