Enter your email address to receive our daily LGBT news roundup

You're free to unsubscribe at any time.

Man who killed gay council worker has sentence reduced

Post your comment

Comments on this article are now closed.

Reader comments

  1. I don’t see why he should get this reduction. It was murder, plain and simple. Murder is murder.

  2. Pumpkin Pie 18 Dec 2009, 12:55pm

    No way should this have been reduced. If anything it should have been increased. It doesn’t matter if he didn’t intend to kill his victim. You cannot just use lethal force on someone and then hope they survive. Anyone who kills somebody through intentional, excessive and sustained violence should be treated as if they intended to murder their target. Otherwise, it’s a case of blaming the victim and saying it was their fault they didn’t survive.

  3. Talk about sending a wrong message out, this is a total disgrace!

  4. Mihangel apYrs 18 Dec 2009, 1:17pm

    and the homophobic bottom feeder who instigated it got 1 YEAR: talk about leniency

  5. Bad move! Open invite to homophobes! The victim is dead and it was Murder; nuff said.

  6. “Although Judge Lady Paton acknowledged the “unjustified, vicious and callous attack”, she said the judge who sentenced Meehan had not given enough weight to his previous relatively clean record and the remorse he had shown.”

    What the FCUK has a ‘previous relatively clean record’ or ‘remorse’ got to do with anything? This judge is just an idiot – murder is murder is murder, and a life sentence should mean life, not 16 years and most certainly not a mere two years!

    It’s hard not to wonder if such leniency would have been shown had it been a racist morder or a religiously-motivated murder.

  7. Deceased James Kerr will be relieved that his killer is remorseful.

  8. It’s like what I have said before:
    “If this was a murder and the victims were str8 he would get a harsher sentence but because they are gay he will get a lighter sentence.”

  9. BrazilBoysBlog 18 Dec 2009, 9:29pm

    Disgusting.. And why oh why did the scumbag 15-yr old only get ONE years detention? He is well above the age of ‘criminal responsibility’, therefore he should have got life. It was admitted by the judge that the younger lad initiated the whole thing, and that homophobia was the motive, so why only 1 year? I agree, sends out the wrong messages altogether.

  10. darkmoonman 18 Dec 2009, 10:30pm

    One again, we gays are treated as 2nd class citizens.

  11. Jean-Paul Bentham 19 Dec 2009, 7:13am

    It must be the influence of the colonies, namely Uganda.

  12. Sister Mary Clarence 20 Dec 2009, 2:41pm

    BrazilBoysBlog – that’s the bit I’m really struggling with. Also, it escapes me how the judge could comment “she added that there was nothing to show homophobic intent on the part of Meehan”, when the attack was in response to the younger boy’s allegations that the victim had made sexual advances at him.

  13. theotherone 20 Dec 2009, 3:36pm

    it’s Perth. Perth is outside the Central Belt in Scotland and things are bad enough in the Glasgow/ Edinburgh/ Stirling/ Ayr area.

    It’s not the lack of Homophobic intent, it’s the place it happend in.

These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews.co.uk. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous, please contact us.

Top commenters this week

Latest stories

See all