Man who killed gay council worker has sentence reduced

× Close window

Reader Comments

  1. I don’t see why he should get this reduction. It was murder, plain and simple. Murder is murder.

    Post a reply →
  2. Pumpkin Pie  18 Dec 2009, 12:55pm  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    No way should this have been reduced. If anything it should have been increased. It doesn’t matter if he didn’t intend to kill his victim. You cannot just use lethal force on someone and then hope they survive. Anyone who kills somebody through intentional, excessive and sustained violence should be treated as if they intended to murder their target. Otherwise, it’s a case of blaming the victim and saying it was their fault they didn’t survive.

    Post a reply →
  3. Squidgy  18 Dec 2009, 1:10pm  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    Talk about sending a wrong message out, this is a total disgrace!

    Post a reply →
  4. Mihangel apYrs  18 Dec 2009, 1:17pm  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    and the homophobic bottom feeder who instigated it got 1 YEAR: talk about leniency

    Post a reply →
  5. Bad move! Open invite to homophobes! The victim is dead and it was Murder; nuff said.

    Post a reply →
  6. AndySam  18 Dec 2009, 4:16pm  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    “Although Judge Lady Paton acknowledged the “unjustified, vicious and callous attack”, she said the judge who sentenced Meehan had not given enough weight to his previous relatively clean record and the remorse he had shown.”

    What the FCUK has a ‘previous relatively clean record’ or ‘remorse’ got to do with anything? This judge is just an idiot – murder is murder is murder, and a life sentence should mean life, not 16 years and most certainly not a mere two years!

    It’s hard not to wonder if such leniency would have been shown had it been a racist morder or a religiously-motivated murder.

    Post a reply →
  7. Deceased James Kerr will be relieved that his killer is remorseful.

    Post a reply →
  8. It’s like what I have said before:
    “If this was a murder and the victims were str8 he would get a harsher sentence but because they are gay he will get a lighter sentence.”

    Post a reply →
  9. Disgusting.. And why oh why did the scumbag 15-yr old only get ONE years detention? He is well above the age of ‘criminal responsibility’, therefore he should have got life. It was admitted by the judge that the younger lad initiated the whole thing, and that homophobia was the motive, so why only 1 year? I agree, sends out the wrong messages altogether.

    Post a reply →
  10. darkmoonman  18 Dec 2009, 10:30pm  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    One again, we gays are treated as 2nd class citizens.

    Post a reply →
  11. Jean-Paul Bentham  19 Dec 2009, 7:13am  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    It must be the influence of the colonies, namely Uganda.

    Post a reply →
  12. Sister Mary Clarence  20 Dec 2009, 2:41pm  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    BrazilBoysBlog – that’s the bit I’m really struggling with. Also, it escapes me how the judge could comment “she added that there was nothing to show homophobic intent on the part of Meehan”, when the attack was in response to the younger boy’s allegations that the victim had made sexual advances at him.

    Post a reply →
  13. theotherone  20 Dec 2009, 3:36pm  Report
    Thumb up 0Thumb down

    it’s Perth. Perth is outside the Central Belt in Scotland and things are bad enough in the Glasgow/ Edinburgh/ Stirling/ Ayr area.

    It’s not the lack of Homophobic intent, it’s the place it happend in.

    Post a reply →

Add your comment

These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews.co.uk. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous please click "Report" or email us. Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy




Top users this week

  • Kiuru7 378
  • Robert in S. Kensington 358
  • That There Other David 311
  • Eddy 304
  • D.McCabe 282
  • Jock S. Trap 279
  • twitless 265
  • Rehan 241
  • Pavlos 220
  • bobbleobble 215