Adjacent to it on YouTube was Captain Pugwash! Now THAT I do remember! So I’ve had quite an injection of nostalgia this morning!

Keep well and chirpy – and don’t slip in those leaves!

Purely in the interests of edukashun, Eddy, you understand.
K

Thanks for the explanation re. “Alistair”. That programme somehow is completely unknown to me. I shall keep an eye out for any nostalgic reminiscences about it.

Ok, you at the back…I heard that…”So what’s new..!” – gibe..

“Crystal Tipps and Alistair” was a cartoon show on the telly back in the dim mists of time….a little girl and her doggie Alistair.

If you are not of a ‘certain age’ it will have been meaningless.

As is much of wot I write.

I thanked you for the ‘tip’ and the pun fell flat from thereon in…
Shall I gas myself now or later..?

K

Well thank you for the tips, Crystal; hope Alistair is ok.!
Hahaha..
I never use fouleries on here and never have; I have always disguised the words; morphed them into “twots” or daft “tuncs” or what a load of “ckuffing” … and so on, knowing full well and in advance that some things are screened for filthitude…resulting in el choppo for the norty correspondent.

So I don’t know what was up with it; Hartley’s Week probabubbly.
Also I have a DONGLE and they are not brill….not 100% so I put it down to that too mebs…?

Keith.
x

Re. the problem of posting messages. I have worked out that PinkNews has a “black list” of “forbidden” words. Include any of those words in your text and your message won’t post. The way round this is to insert asterisks, i.e. “All religionists believe in ridiculous nonsense, they are all therefore great big f***ing *wats!”

And if a message doesn’t post, then the thing to do is just click your right mouse-button and then select “Back”, and all the text that you tried to post will re-appear in the box. Then go through it and deal with any words like to appear on the black-list.

If a messsage still won’t post, after you replaced letters with asterisks, then use the “Back” trick, copy the whole thing, paste it into Notepad or Word, and then copy and paste back into the Comment box one paragraph at a time. That way you should be able to pinpoint the paragraph that contains the thing that the PinkNews software doesn’t like.

Keith, one day I’m catching the train up to Manchester to take all seven feet of you to lunch! Have you joined the PinkNews “My” section? If you sign up, we can send each other private messages from there.

Regards,
Eddy.

And don’t tell me, GAY CATHOLIC, that JP II did not know or that Cardinal Ratzinger (now BENEDICT XVI) didn’t either.

Them two were as thick as thieves.

“SANTO SUBITO”…the crowd chanted in St. Peter’s Sq. after JP II’s demise…?
In a pig’s ear.

Their silence compounds the felony to criminal-conspiracy proportions.
All it would have taken would have been JP II to listen or the earlier one PAUL VI or JOHN XXIII…and act.

JP I snuffed it before he could open his trap…or WAS snuffed, more like.

No…Too bizzy pickin’ yet another silly, camp outfit.

The pox on the lot.

Keith.

If I hadn’t got a turkey in the oven with all the trimmings I’d gas mesel’..!
hahaha.
I am so peeved..

GAY CATHOLIC..
GO TELL MICHAEL O’BRIEN TO “Get over it..!”

And see then if you still have your head on your shoulders.
Keith.

I have tried to reply and I also wrote something else yesterday but there are gremlins on the line and it won’t accept my text.

And of course, then it tells me that I am posting a dupl. comment.
Ah well!
Saves everybody getting bored witless; all clouds come silver- lined, I suppose…!

Keith

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qvtng1OzKak

Regards,
Eddy.

Vatican distancing from Barragan; and bears don’t crap in the woods.

Way to go , KEITH! Gay catholic, my ass. Member of Courage, more likely. Idiot.

Gay and Catholic?

My arse.

You cannot be GAY and a CATHOLIC; you cannot practise both.

You can be a practising homosexual, i.e. ‘gay’ and a Catholic who is never out of the confessional-box, as in living in it 24/7/365 and therefore deluding yourself… OR you can be a homosexually oriented person and therefore “intrinsically morally disordered” and “called to a life of total celibacy”..the Pope’s words, not mine.

You are totally celibate, are you GAY CATHOLIC?
Or have you a less than platonic boyff..?
Never even think of having a ham-shank because that too is a mortal sin, hence the need to live in the confesional-box 24/7/365…24/7/366 in a leap year.
You cannot have the toffee AND the ha’p'nny; it is one or the other….

‘QUEST’ once tried to tell me….’things have changed..’
The hell they have.

I think I’d rather read daft RAHMAN than you; I can laff at that numpty.
You?
You make me madder ‘n hell.

I am assuming the while that you are male..?

Keith.
SALFORD

Tell that to the victims, Father O’ Slaoibhean, (you have to be a priest to be coming out with a crass comment like that on here.)

After 20-30-40-50-60-70-years, YOU go and tell that to the victims of ANY abuse – from the last 2 or 3 people that can be alive from the 1st World War, through the 2nd; through the death camps; through Korea and Vietnam; the World Trade Centre Towers; through to this, the Church’s scandal in Ireland and on into the future.

“Get over it.!” ..you say..?

How arrogant!

YOU bloody well get over it; get over your sodding religion; it is stifling you, blinding you; it – and others like it – have killed and maimed and blighted the ckuffing lives of millions.

I got over it; you do the same.

I could publish the name and address NOW of the bunch of bastards, one tit from whose number I went to school with, now a religious (priest) – who not very long ago told me, similarly, to “get over it” in much the same way as you are doing here, above at yours, #35.

“Get over it…!” …indeed…!

I’d ckuffing well give you “Get over it…!”…if I were ever to meet you face to face…!

You’d not be standing to tell me twice..

YOU DON’T .. YOU DON’T .. YOU DON’TTTTT get over it, that is the whole point.

Remember the old Irish geezer on “Question Time” not too long ago breaking down in floods of tears? It’s on YOUTUBE.

Now he is either a damned fine actor or absolutely broken by his experience.

It is taking me all my time now, GAY CATHOLIC, not to descend into my huge knowledge of Anglo-Saxon expletives and so I shall say it in another way ‘go away,foolish person of dubious parentage.’

Keith.
SALFORD

It is not “old news”. It is fresh, fresh news, and it will continue to be so for some time to come. We will never get over it.

The fact that the Vatican distances itself from people like Barragan who glibbly state RCC teachings on sexuality does not change the content of the Vatican’s so-called ‘Pastoral’ Hallowe’en Letter of ’86 which states that homosexuals are intrinsically “evil”. The Vatican may not express itself as glibbly as Barragan, but the teaching is one and the same, and you know it.

Have you “gotten over” the Hallowe’en Letter of ’86?? If you have, then you should not only read it again, but also keep it in your missal and read it frequently. Why?

Because it is not “old news” either. Don’t kid yourself, honey.

Then it might dawn on you that only by taking the teachings of Jesus away from the Vatican and into the homes of the faithful will the RCC survice into the 21st Century. Why?

Because the Vatican has now completely suppressed the work of the Oecumenical Council Vatican II (the teachings of Jesus for the 21st Century) and is heading back to a papacy of absolute power similar to the monarchy of Louis XIV.

For example, who did ben16 consult before lifting the excommunication of the heretics “mgrs. lefebvre and his following”?

Nobody. It was a unilateral decision taken by the pope himself without consulting any cardinal or any bishop.

This man is 82-years-old and he wants bishops to retire at 65. What’s wrong with this picture??

Use your head, and don’t be so damned brazen as to come onto a gay website defending a religious institution that would see you burn in hell just because you were born gay…and don’t let their lip-service fool ya!

http://www.intelligencesquared.com/iq2-video/2009/atheism-is-the-new-fundamentalism