Comments on: California town’s mayor calls gays ‘sinful’

By: JohnK

JohnK — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:48:12 +0000

Rahmans Islamic solution to homosexuality.

1. Repent of your homosexality
2. Convert to heterosexuality

For those who refuse to comply with the above, you will be killed by being taken to the top of a mountain and then in the name of Allah . . . thrown off it.

How do I know this about Rahman. Check out the 616 threads of dialogue with this extremist fantatical islamist crackpot.

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/11/24/london-universities-invite-homophobic-preacher-to-speak

By: Jean-Paul Bentham

Jean-Paul Bentham — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:07:48 +0000

Rose, Simon Murphy and JohnK all saying he same thing: Ignore Rahman.

He is a disrupter. Why can’t we just ignore him. He is “kara beech”, full of sh…t!

By: Will

Will — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:05:38 +0000

“He distroys his path to Heaven.”

Rahman, there is no heaven. Just a false hope made by people like you and this mayor. Try doing something more constructive with your life than ranting like a lunatic on a gay site for our amusement, there’s a good little troll.

By: Keith

Keith — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:14:07 +0000

1.
Osby Davis.

2.
RAHMAN – of PINKNEWS fame…almost 600 comments now on another thread.

3.
Jozef Ratzinger.

All got lots to spout about summat they shouldn’t be knowing owt about.

Unless of cou…..

I think I’ve got it in one.

Keith.

By: Simon Murphy

Simon Murphy — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:20:51 +0000

People should ignore Rahman.

If you reply to him then the whole discussion gets hijacked by irrelevancy.

By: Rose

Rose — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:52:13 +0000

There was an intelligent discussion going on here until this Rahman started! Then it all fell apart. It’s just deliberate disruption of the discussion.

By: Neville

Neville — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:43:51 +0000

Oh course Rahman is a homosexual. He likes boy’s bums and he likes lingam up his yoni.
The evil Muslim comments about homosexuals is not lawful in this country. Recent hate legislation can mean that he will be hunted down and face the full force of British law and not the nonsense of sharia law!

By: JohnK

JohnK — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:34:34 +0000

Jane . . . ignore him . . . another Troll Wacko who has generated 450 threads of homophobic bile on the Islamic Univeristy Soceity thread.

By: Jane

Jane — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:14:01 +0000

And by the way, LAWFUL in the way you mean it, that is on the basis of Islamic belief, may well not be lawful under the Law of this country. Since we do live in a civil society and not a religious one, your saying that your attitudes are “perfectly LAWFUL” is quite likely to be wrong and reveals exactly what and where your problem is.

By: Jane

Jane — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:57:31 +0000

Of course you can believe what you like and live your life as you like, at least in Western countries. What you are doing, though, is benefitting from those freedoms (which are rare in Muslim countries, I lived in one for fourteen years) and abusing those freedoms by seeking to impose on the rest of us your unfree and restrictive philosophy. That is what we don’t accept and never will.

By: Neville

Neville — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:56:41 +0000

There can be no reasoned debate over the Koran or the Bible as both are based on nonsense and are, therefore, themselves nonsense -’Nothing can be made of nothing’!

By: flapjack

flapjack — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:10:59 +0000

Neville – In fairness to Rahman I think someone is posting under his name on that thread which muddies the waters a bit. I’m sure he wouldn’t post that comment himself even if he was closet.
However, those comments that do sound like he said them himself are pretty much what we’ve come to expect from Hank, but using the Koran rather than the Bible as his source of all wisdom and knowledge.
As such a reasoned debate with him is a non-starter as empirical evidence doesn’t even come into it.

By: Neville

Neville — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:26:32 +0000

Rahman has admitted on the page about the university cancelling a talk by a Muslim preacher that he is not the fundamentalist Muslim that he has pretended to be. He admits to liking ‘boys bums 16 and 17 yrs’ and to liking a ‘lingam up my yoni’. What does that make him?

By: Brian Burton

Brian Burton — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:19:02 +0000

So we have an Islamic Homosexual on these threads. Do not try to deny it Rahman or else why are you prowling around this Pink Site?

By: Jane

Jane — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:17:57 +0000

Rahman, well yes, I’ve read it, congratulations, just as much rubbish as you find in the “Holy” Bible. If you need to believe in imaginary friends, angels flitting about and all the rest of the paraphenalia of incredulity, then good luck to you.

By: 21stCenturySpirituality

21stCenturySpirituality — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:44:21 +0000

Rahman, please could you provide a sound theological, philosophical, verifiable and rational argument to support the assertions you have made in comment 22. Thank you.

By: Nina

Nina — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:40:34 +0000

The Mayor does NOT represent most Christians. 2008 UK figures show that over 70% are gay affirming (same figure as for the general population). As a Christian from that 70% majority and part of the gay affirming Liberty Church in Blackpool I strongly object to the Mayors comment and his very narrow view that is distorted enough to think that God would be prejudiced about part of his own creation. He doesn’t seem to know the Jesus who sided with the marginalised and spoke up against injustice.

By: Coemgenus

Coemgenus — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:00:04 +0000

Is this Mayor allowed to threaten his Gay electors? Don’t these religious cranks equate “sin” with everlasting punishment and torture? Even in the USA there must be some law to prevent this drivel?

By: Jean-Paul Bentham

Jean-Paul Bentham — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:35:34 +0000

“Gay rights activists were not placated by the apology”…I should say!

Mike (12):

Good one!

By: Paul

Paul — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:46:22 +0000

Let me guess. A ‘devout’ Christian? Of course. This piece of crap Osby Davis shamefully led the City of Vallejo into California’s first City Bankrupcy. As a resident of Vallejo I can confirm he won by a handful of votes over an openly gay man. Guess the po folks of Vallejo voted him in their ignorance.
Way to go, homophobe! YOU’LL answer in hell, Davis.