Whoa! The Supreme Court in question is the California Supreme Court; the court did not overturn Prop 8, it overturned an initiative. Prop 8 is on the November ballot here in California; it would amend the California state constitution. Because of the California Supreme Court decision, as of today same-sex marriage is legal in this state. Prop 8 would remove that right.
Each state has its own Supreme Court and its own Constitution. In cases of conflict, the Federal Constitution and Court system prevails.
Why is it called a “rumor” when gay people are involved. What proof would be required … a video or anal fluid DNA sample? And why aren’t these stringent requirements of proof demanded of straights?
These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews.co.uk. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous please click "Report" or email us. Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy
Whoa! The Supreme Court in question is the California Supreme Court; the court did not overturn Prop 8, it overturned an initiative. Prop 8 is on the November ballot here in California; it would amend the California state constitution. Because of the California Supreme Court decision, as of today same-sex marriage is legal in this state. Prop 8 would remove that right.
Each state has its own Supreme Court and its own Constitution. In cases of conflict, the Federal Constitution and Court system prevails.
Why is it called a “rumor” when gay people are involved. What proof would be required … a video or anal fluid DNA sample? And why aren’t these stringent requirements of proof demanded of straights?
Sounds like you’re trying to use gay rumors to hurt McCain. It seems to be a non-story to me.