David, it is indeed rubbish and I smell a rat! They should conduct a larger study of entirely straight men to find out what the ratio is between them compared to straight women and gay people. Maybe fewer straight men showed up for the study, who knows? I suspect the study is flawed and the researchers’ mindset biased.
Rahman has long since been discredited – his past ‘research’ work “proved” there was no such thing as bisexuality a while ago. I would expect better editorial control at PinkNews than to report his findings as if they were real science. Worse still, didn’t he publish this one about two years ago (http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7069 attests)? So: probably untrue, hardly news and barely science…
These comments are un-moderated and do not necessarily represent the views of PinkNews.co.uk. If you believe that a comment is inappropriate or libellous please click "Report" or email us. Terms and Conditions · Privacy Policy
what absolute rubbish! and based on only 140 volunteers !!! Ha, how rediculous!
David, it is indeed rubbish and I smell a rat! They should conduct a larger study of entirely straight men to find out what the ratio is between them compared to straight women and gay people. Maybe fewer straight men showed up for the study, who knows? I suspect the study is flawed and the researchers’ mindset biased.
This looks like another boll***s “study” showing how gays are more like women. Absolute crap. Why do they waste money on stupid research like this?!
Rahman has long since been discredited – his past ‘research’ work “proved” there was no such thing as bisexuality a while ago. I would expect better editorial control at PinkNews than to report his findings as if they were real science. Worse still, didn’t he publish this one about two years ago (http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7069 attests)? So: probably untrue, hardly news and barely science…